Chinese Courts and Internet Judiciary(Ⅲ)  

中国法院的互联网司法(下)

出　　处：《Beijing Review》2020年第1期I0001-I0008,共8页北京周报（英文版）

摘　　要：Appendix:Influential Cases of Internet Judiciary in China Case 1 Fuzhou Jiunong Trade Co.,Ltd.v.Shanghai Xunmeng Information Technology Co.,Ltd.Disputes over Contracts for Internet Services Significance Since online shopping has characteristics such as rapid trading,large trading volume,broad cross-regional scope,decentralized subjects,it is increasingly difficult for administrative departments to supervise e-commerce,and the self-regulated rules of platforms are playing an increasingly significant role.This case clarified that the registration agreement signed between the platform and the merchants stipulating the"consumer compensation"belongs to a self-regulated behavior of the online community,provided that the content of the agreement does not violate the compulsory provisions under the laws and administrative regulations.When a merchant sells counterfeits on the platform that constitutes a breach of contract,according to the agreed"consumer compensation"rules the ecommerce platform is entitled to hold the sum of the compensation from the merchant's accounts and directly make payments to the compensated consumers,which helps affirm the effectiveness of the self-regulated rules of the Internet platform.附录:中国互联网司法典型案例案例一:福州九农贸易有限公司诉上海寻梦信息技术有限公司网络服务合同纠纷典型意义基于网络平台发生的购物活动,具有买卖迅速、交易量大、跨地域广、主体分散等特点,行政部门监督难度不断加大,网络平台自治规则的作用不断增强。本案明确平台与商家在入驻协议中约定“消费者赔付金”,属于平台自治行为,且协议内容不违反法律、行政法规的强制性规定。当商家在平台上发生售假行为构成违约时,平台有权按照约定的“消费者赔付金”规则,直接扣付相关钱款给消费者,肯定了互联网平台自治规则的效力。

关 键 词：强制性规定 违反法律 自治规则 网络平台 互联网平台 购物活动 信息技术 跨地域 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]