矿产资源产权、政府分权与矿业大部制改革  

Property Rights of Mineral Resources, Decentralization of Government and Reform of Super-Ministry System of Mining Industry

作　　者：吴垠[1] 孔德 罗家豪 WU Yin;KONG De;LUO Jiahao

机构地区：[1]西南财经大学

出　　处：《中国矿业大学学报（社会科学版）》2020年第1期69-88,共20页Journal of China University of Mining & Technology(Social Sciences)

基　　金：西南财经大学经济学院双一流建设子项目“新时代中国特色社会主义政治经济学理论与实践”;2014年国家社科基金青年项目“我国新型城镇化道路的理论、模式与政策研究”(项目编号:14CJY023)

摘　　要：基于“有效率的产权必须是可以分割的”这一观点,按照时间顺序将新中国成立以来矿权配置制度分为U型分权结构为主导的计划经济时期和M型分权结构为主导的改革开放时期,基于此来分析“分权”对“矿权”的影响。在U、M分权模型基础上重新界定了研究对象,将矿产资源产权制度改革中具有核心意义的“分权制度”特征加以模型化分析,探讨地方政府在不同激励机制下的行为模式对矿产资源产权制度改革的影响,并力图建立中国矿产资源产权制度改革的一个理论分析框架来探讨“分权”“分利”和“分风险”等影响矿产资源产权制度改革和矿业经济发展的核心问题,最后指出矿业大部制管理体制可能是改进中国矿业政府间分权制度的有效途径。Based on the idea that"efficient property rights must be separable",the mineral rights allocation system was chronologically divided into the period of planned economy dominated by U-shaped decentralization structure and the period of reform and opening up dominated by M-shaped decentralization structure,based on which the impact of the"decentralization"on"mineral rights"has been analyzed.The objects of study were redefined on the basis of the two decentralization models.And a model analysis was carried out focusing on the characteristics of the decentralization system that were ofvital significance in the reform of the property rights system for mineral resources.A theoretical analysis framework for the reform of mineral resources property rights system in China was established to explore core issues influencing the reform of themineral property rights systemand mining economic development,such as"power decentralization","interest decentralization"and"risk decentralization".This paper ended with the conclusion that the super-ministry management system of mining may be an effective way to improve the government decentralization system of the mining industry in China.

关 键 词：矿产资源 分权制度 U型结构 M型结构 矿业大部制管理体制 

分 类 号：F426.1[经济管理—产业经济]