检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈建光[1] CHEN Jian-guang(Department of Orthopedics,The First Peopled Hospital of Nanyang,Henan Nanyang 473000,China)
机构地区:[1]南阳市第一人民医院骨科,河南南阳473000
出 处:《医药论坛杂志》2019年第12期86-88,共3页Journal of Medical Forum
摘 要:目的分析腰椎间盘突出症采用不同微创手术方式治疗的临床效果。方法于南阳市第一人民医院2017年2月至2019年4月期间收治的腰椎间盘突出症患者中选取70例,根据手术方式不同随机分为两组,A组采用经皮椎间孔镜手术,B组采用微创通道手术治疗,比较两组治疗效果。结果A组患者的切口长度为(0.7±0.2)cm,术中出血量为(18.2±3.1)mL,住院时间为(6.2±1.3)d,分别与对照组的(2.5±0.6)cm、(46.4±5.7)mL和(10.8±1.9)d比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组手术时间比较差异不明显,对比无统计学意义(P>0.05)。A组术后腰腿痛VAS评分为(1.8±0.3)分,显著低于B组的(2.4±0.6)分,差异明显。A组与B组术后0DI指数比较,无显著性差异(P>0.05)。A组与B组治疗优良率分别为94.2%和91.4%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论经皮椎间孔镜手术和微创通道手术在腰椎间盘突出症治疗中均具有较好疗效,但经皮椎间孔镜手术给患者造成的创伤更小,患者术后恢复更快,具有更高安全性。Objective To analyze the clinical effects of different minimally invasive surgical methods for lumbar disc herniation.Methods Totally 70 patients with lumbar disc herniation admitted to our hospital from February 2017 to April 2019 were selected and divided into two groups.Group A received percutaneous intervertebral foraminal surgery and group B received minimally invasive channel surgery to compare the therapeutic effects of the two groups.Results The incision length was(0.7±0.2)cm,the intraoperative blood loss was(18.2±3.1)mL,and the hospital stay was(6.2±1.3)days,which were significantly different from the(2.5±0.6)cm,(46.4±5.7)mL and(10.8±1.9)days in the control group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in operation time between the two groups(P>0.05).VAS score of postoperative lumbar and leg pain in group A was(1.8±0.3),which was significantly lower than(2.4±0.6)in group B.There was no significant difference in the postoperative ODI index between group A and group B(P>0.05).The excellent and good rates of treatment in group A and group B were 94.2% and 91.4%,respectively,with no statistically significant difference(P>0.05).Conclusion Percutaneous intervertebral foramen surgery and minimally invasive channel surgery have good efficacy in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation,but percutaneous intervertebral foramen surgery causes less trauma to patients,patients recover faster after surgery,and has higher safety.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.12.164.78