武汉市人才安居房选址对比研究——以新地社区和乐乎社区为例  

The contrastive study of site selection of Wuhan talented apartment:Taking Xindi and Lehu as example

作　　者：王望珍[1] 徐冠博 WANG Wang-zhen;XU Guan-bo(School of Civil Engineering,Wuhan University,Whuhan 430072)

机构地区：[1]武汉大学土木建筑工程学院

出　　处：《湖北农业科学》2019年第24期221-226,共6页Hubei Agricultural Sciences

摘　　要：为解决武汉市人才安居房入住冷热不均的问题,实现合理规划人才安居房选址的目的,以新地社区和乐乎大学生社区为例,通过实地发放调查问卷获取数据,运用综合可支付力法测算两处选址点的住房、交通、综合可支付性指数。结果表明,住房、交通以及综合可支付性指数,新地社区分别为24.70%、8.04%、32.74%;乐乎社区分别为16.55%、18.86%、35.42%,且均低于国际限值,两处选址点均合理。新地社区选址优于乐乎社区,但乐乎社区居民交通可支付性指数具有更大的下降空间,更适于做安置房选址点;乐乎社区交通可支付性指数及平均通勤时间是新地社区的二倍,这是人才安居房入住冷热不均的根本原因,减小交通可支付性指数及通勤时间可大幅度平衡人才安居房的入住。In order to solve the problem of extreme imbalance of talented apartment’s occupancy and achieve the goal of talented apartment reasonable site selection.Taking Xindi community and Lehu community as examples by recycling the questionnaire to obtain the relevant data to calculate the index of housing affordability, transportation affordability and transportationhousing affordability by using the method of comprehensive affordable force. The results showed that the HAI, TAI and THAI of Xindi were 24.70%, 8.04% and 32.74%, while Lehu were 16.55%, 18.86% and 35.42%, both below the international limit, the site selection of Xindi and Lehu were reasonable. Next compared those dates, it was indicated that the site selection of Xindi was a lit better than Lehu, while Lehu community was much more suitable for site selection in the long run as the reason of more potency to decline in TAI. The TAI and AT of Lehu more than twice higher of Xindi was the radical reason leading the extreme imbalance of talented apartment’s occupancy, thus the reduce of TAI and AT played a positive role of balancing talented apartment’s occupancy.

关 键 词：人才安居房 选址对比 综合可支付力 土地资源规划 

分 类 号：TU984.12[建筑科学—城市规划与设计]