“通知删除”规则的再检讨  

Re-examining the Rule of “Notice and Takedown”

作　　者：李扬 陈铄 Li Yang;Chen Shuo

机构地区：[1]中山大学法学院

出　　处：《知识产权》2020年第1期25-38,共14页Intellectual Property

基　　金：国家社会学科基金一般项目“知识产权反公地悲剧的法经济学分析及其治理研究”18BFX163的阶段性成果

摘　　要：“通知删除”规则通过激励网络服务提供者接收来自权利人的侵权通知,采取相应必要措施,配合权利人维权,制止网络侵权行为的蔓延。我国《侵权责任法》第36条已然将《信息网络传播权保护条例》所规定的“通知删除”规则修正为“通知与必要措施”规则。实践中,包括接入、传输服务提供者等在内的网络服务提供者应当适用“通知删除”规则,并根据案件的具体情况,参考比例原则采取必要措施,且其采取的措施并不限于“定位清除”,还包括建立顺畅的“通知受理转通知”渠道以及提供侵权行为人相关信息、终止网络服务等与其所提供服务的特点相匹配的措施。The rule of“notice and takedown”encourages internet service providers to receive infringement notices from right owners,in order to take corresponding necessary measures and help the right owners to safeguard their rights and prohibit the spread of network infringement.Article 36 of The Tort Liability Act in China has amended the rule of“notice and takedown”to the rule of“notice and necessary measures”.In practice,internet service providers,including internet access and transmission service providers,should apply the“notice and takedown”rule,and adopt necessary measures to address various cases in line with the principle of proportionality.Meanwhile,the measures shall not be restricted to“fixed-point clearing”,but also include the establishment of a smooth channel of“notice-accept-convey notice”,the provision of relevant information about the infringer,and the termination of internet services and other measures matching the characteristics of the services provided.

关 键 词：网络服务提供者 网络侵权行为 “通知删除” 必要措施 适用主体 比例原则 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学] D922.16[政治法律—法学]