建构主义在马克思恩格斯道德理论中的理论形态与误读范式  

The Theoretical Form and Misreading Paradigm of Constructivism in Moral Theory of Marx and Engels

作　　者：金德楠[1] JIN De-nan(School of Marxism,Peking University,Beijing 100871,China)

机构地区：[1]北京大学马克思主义学院

出　　处：《东北大学学报（社会科学版）》2020年第1期106-111,共6页Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science)

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大资助项目(16JJD710003)

摘　　要：马克思恩格斯道德理论肯定人作为道德主体具有的能动性与实践性特质,明确了生产劳动与物质利益对道德的支配性作用,完成了对意识形态化的"道德论说"的理论批判,为道德建构主义预留了理论空间。同时,它描述了一套以现实的人为建构主体、以道德生产和道德建设为建构程序、以"真正人的道德"为建构目标的严整体系,展现出道德建构主义的鲜明底色。由于对建构主义在马克思恩格斯道德理论中的理论形态的误解误读,出现了单纯强调马克思恩格斯道德理论的道德解构效用、无视其道德建构意义,抑或反之的现象,助涨了"伦理社会主义"思潮与"马克思恩格斯反道德主义"思潮,使之成为了人们科学认知马克思恩格斯道德理论的两大理论误区。The moral theory of Marx and Engels affirms the dynamic and practical characteristic of human beings as moral subjects. It clarifies the dominant role of productive labor and material benefits on morality, completes the theoretical criticism of ideological "moral theory", and reserves the theoretical space for moral constructivism. At the same time, it describes a rigorous system which takes the realistic individual as the subject, the action and construction of morality as the procedure, and the "real person’s morality" as the goal. It shows the essential characteristics of the moral constructivism. Because of the misreading of the theoretical form of constructivism in the moral theory of Marx and Engels, there has been a simple emphasis on the moral deconstruction of the moral theory of Marx and Engels, ignoring its moral construction significance, or vice versa, which has fueled to boost the thoughts of "ethical socialism" and "anti-moralism of Marx and Engels", making them the two theoretical errors in people’s scientific understanding of the moral theory of Marx and Engels.

关 键 词：马克思恩格斯道德理论 道德建构主义 伦理社会主义 反道德主义 

分 类 号：A81[哲学宗教—马克思主义哲学]