检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:余佩诗 YV Pei-shi(School of Law,South China University of Technology,Guangzhou Guangdong 510006,China)
出 处:《齐齐哈尔大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2020年第1期110-112,共3页Journal of Qiqihar University(Philosophy & Social Science Edition)
摘 要:保护作品完整权是我国《著作权法》所规定的作品精神权利的核心,赋予作者保护作品不受他人歪曲、篡改的权利。然而,随着时代发展,网络上关于作品的二次创作形式和内容的多样化使相关法律规定捉襟见肘,保护作品完整权的内涵也应与时俱进。以“谷阿莫”系列的网络短视频为例,对戏仿作品是否侵犯保护作品完整权展开讨论,提出了在网络环境中对于保护作品完整权的完善建议:首先要区分“歪曲、篡改”行为和合理的修改行为,其次要确定客观主义标准的侵权规则,再次需要统一对于影响原作者声誉的判断标准。The protection of the right of integrity is the core of the spiritual rights of works as stipulated in China’s Copyright Law,giving authors the right to protect their works from distortion and tampering.However,with the development of the times,the diversification of the second creation form and content of the works on the Internet has made the relevant legal provisions stretched,and the connotation of protecting the integrity of the works should also keep pace with the times.Taking the short video of the“Gu Amo”Series as an example,this paper discusses whether the parody works infringe the right to protect the integrity of the works,and puts forward suggestions for perfecting the right of the integrity in the network environment.First of all,it is to distinguish between“distorting and tampering behaviors”and“reasonable modification behaviors”;secondly,to determine the infringement rules of the objectivist standard;thirdly,to unify the criteria for judging the impacts on the reputation of the original author.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.62