检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王汉杰 温涛[2] 韩佳丽[3] WANG Hanjie;WEN Tao;HAN Jiali(Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development,Goettingen University,Goettingen 37073,Germany;College of Economics and Management,Southwest University,Chongqing 400715,China;School of Economics,Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120,China)
机构地区:[1]哥廷根大学农业经济与农村发展系,德国哥廷根37073 [2]西南大学经济管理学院,重庆400715 [3]西南政法大学经济学院,重庆401120
出 处:《财经理论与实践》2020年第1期93-99,共7页The Theory and Practice of Finance and Economics
基 金:国家自然科学基金面上项目(71773099);国家社会科学基金重点项目(14AZD034);中宣部文化名家暨“四个一批”人才项目(中宣办发[2017]47号);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(19XJC840002);第66批中国博士后科学基金面上项目(2019M663430)
摘 要:基于政策协同视角,运用两阶段最小二乘法与工具变量分位数回归法实证考察贫困地区农村金融减贫效应发挥的财政政策协同效应。结果表明:总体而言,贫困地区农村金融有利于减贫,但部分贫困县域的减贫效应并不显著;非贫困地区的农村金融减贫效应明显高于贫困地区;贫困地区财政政策显著抑制了农村金融减贫效应的发挥,且贫困程度越深的县域,抑制作用越大,即两者尚未形成有效协同。Based on the perspective of policy synergy,this paper empirically examines the fiscal policy synergy effect of rural financial poverty alleviation in poor areas by using Two-stage Least Squares method and Instrumental Variable Quantile Regression.The results show that rural finance in poverty-stricken areas is conducive to poverty alleviation,but the poverty reduction effect of some poverty-stricken counties is not significant.On the contrary,the rural financial poverty reduction effect in non-poverty areas is significantly higher than that in poverty-stricken areas.In addition,fiscal policy in poverty-stricken areas significantly inhibits rural finance.The poorer the country is,the greater the inhibition effect exists,indicating that the fiscal and financial policies have not yet formed effective synergy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229