网格化社会治理:理论逻辑、运行机制与风险规避  被引量:43

Grid Governance: Theoretical Logic,Operational Mechanism and Risk Avoidance

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:祁文博[1] QI Wen-bo(College of Politics and Public Administration,Soochow University,Suzhou 215123,China)

机构地区:[1]苏州大学政治与公共管理学院

出  处:《北京社会科学》2020年第1期119-128,共10页Social Sciences of Beijing

基  金:“阐释党的十九大精神”国家基金重大专项“打造共建共治共享的社会治理格局”(18VSJ032)

摘  要:网格化治理是当前基层社会治理创新的主要探索方向,如何认识、理解以及评价网格化治理,将影响到国家基层治理的发展走向。从权力运行的向度建构"纵向权力-横向权力"的分析框架,运用此分析框架,对苏南N镇网格化治理实践进行剖析,结果发现:纵向权力强化的力度大大强于横向权力的扩展与参与,以致这种"权威依赖型治理"会带来社会空间挤压、技术凌驾于价值以及治理目标抵牾等风险,造成基层治理体制内在的结构性紧张。化解网格化治理风险的关键在于将服务功能与管理功能统合起来,加强政府主导下多元主体联动的共治模式,以社区协商促进基层治理公共性增长。Currently, grid governance has become a main explorative direction in grassroots social governance innovation. How to recognize, understand and evaluate grid governance will affect the development trends of grassroots governance in China. From the perspective of power operation, this paper builds an analytical framework upon longitudinal power and latitudinal power. By using this analytical framework, the author investigates the practice of grid governance in a township of South Jiangsu Province. It finds that the intensive strength of longitudinal power appears much stronger than the entering and expansion of latitudinal power, and such authority-leading-governance would bring along some risks such as squeezing of social space, technology beyond value, and deviation of governance goals, that might cause the internal structural tensions within the grassroots governance system. The key to resolve these risks of grid governance is to integrate service functions and management functions, strengthen the co-governance mode under leading of governments, and develop public growth of grassroots governance from community consultation.

关 键 词:网格化治理 权力重构 分析框架 秩序生产 

分 类 号:D035[政治法律—政治学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象