东盟人权保护的立场转变与机制化进程探析  

An Analysis on the Position Change and Mechanism of ASEAN’s Human Rights Protection

作　　者：江凯[1] JIANG Kai

机构地区：[1]中共中央党校研究生院

出　　处：《南亚东南亚研究》2019年第6期2-24,151,共24页South and Southeast Asian Studies

摘　　要：作为次区域性人权保护机制的典型,东盟区域性人权保护机制的建设从概念雏形到付诸实践,经历了多个不同的历史发展阶段。从对人权议题的漠视到针对人权理念的“亚洲价值观”的讨论,再到东盟人权机构与人权文书的成型,体现出发展中国家集团对于国际人权规范的认知与立场转变的普遍性过程。尽管东盟在人权保护机制方面取得了较大的进步,但国际社会,特别是西方国家对于这一机制仍旧广泛地持怀疑或批判的态度。针对这些外部的质疑声音,东盟还是需要基于自身的实际情况进行审慎的考虑,在吸收外部合理意见与立足于自身传统规范与“东盟方式”的基础上,推进东盟区域性人权保护机制的进一步发展。由于次区域国家有着更加相似的历史与文化背景以及更加紧密的国家间关系,因此先行构建这种次区域的人权保护机制对于构建亚洲人权保护机制有着很重要的示范作用。东盟的区域人权机制构建过程,既体现出了对国际人权规范的借鉴、吸收与本土化,又体现出了“东盟方式”与“亚洲价值观”的地区色彩。As a typical sub-regional human rights protection mechanism,the construction of ASEAN regional human rights protection mechanism has gone through many different historical stages from conception to practice.From the indifference to human rights issues to the discussion of“Asian values”on the concept of human rights and to the formation of ASEAN human rights institutions as well as human rights instruments,the universal process of developing countries’perceptions and positions on international human rights norms is reflected.Despite the achievements of the existing ASEAN human rights protection mechanism,the international community still has a broad skeptical or critical attitude towards this mechanism.In response to these external voices,ASEAN also needs to carefully consider its own situation and promote the further development of the ASEAN regional human rights protection mechanism on the basis of absorbing external reasonable opinions and based on its own traditional norms and the“ASEAN Way”.

关 键 词：东南亚国家联盟 《东盟宪章》 东盟政府间人权委员会 《东盟人权宣言》 “亚洲价值观” 

分 类 号：D814.1[政治法律—国际关系]