检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:沈建国[1] 王忠[1] 李丹[2] 楼玲 朱徐燕[3] 庞法松[3] 王京文[2] SHEN Jian-guo;WANG Zhong;LI Dan;LOU Ling;ZHU Xu-yan;PANG Fa-song;WANG Jingwen(General Station of Yuhang District of Hangzhou City for Agro-ecology and Plant Protection Administration,Hangzhou 311100,Zhejiang,China;Hangzhou Plant Protection and Soil-fertilizer General Station,Hangzhou 310020,Zhejiang,China;Yuhang District Agricultural Technology Promotion Center of Hangzhou City,Hangzhou 311100,Zhejiang,China)
机构地区:[1]杭州市余杭区农业生态与植物保护管理总站,浙江杭州311100 [2]杭州市植保土肥总站,浙江杭州310020 [3]杭州市余杭区农业技术推广中心,浙江杭州311100
出 处:《中国蔬菜》2020年第1期63-67,共5页China Vegetables
基 金:2014年浙江省三农六万科技协作项目,杭州市农业丰收项目(2017F1-03)
摘 要:以常规施肥为对照,连续两年在化肥总养分减少30%的条件下比较2种水肥一体化模式对浙江杭嘉湖地区春大棚辣椒产量和效益的影响。结果表明:与常规的穴施追肥相比,减量施肥的2种水肥一体化模式均促进了春大棚辣椒的生长,有效提高产量、效益和品质,其中半程水肥一体化模式明显优于全程水肥一体化模式。Taking conventional fertilization as the contrast,through 2 successive years experiments under 30%total chemical fertilizer reduction,this paper compared the effects of 2 water and fertilizer integration models on yield and benefit of spring greenhouse pepper.The results showed that compared with the conventional acupoint application,both of these 2 water and fertilizer integration models had promoted the growth of spring greenhouse pepper and effectively improved its yield,efficiency and quality.In terms of comprehensive performance,the half-way water and fertilizer integration model was obviously better than fullscale water and fertilizer integration model.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222