检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王力[1] 徐李婷[1] WANG Li;XU Liting(Anhui Sanlian University,Hefei 230601,China)
机构地区:[1]安徽三联学院
出 处:《重庆交通大学学报(社会科学版)》2020年第1期54-61,共8页Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University:Social Sciences Edition
基 金:安徽省教育厅人文社会科学研究重点项目“新常态下长三角农业要素禀赋结构对农产品出口影响研究”(SK2016A0347);安徽省教育厅人文社会科学研究重点项目“供给侧结构性改革与合肥外贸转型发展”(SK2017A0588);2019年安徽省高校学科(专业)拔尖人才学术资助项目(gxbjZD55)
摘 要:运用4个比较优势指数,分析21类农产品比较优势变化后得出,近20年来安徽仍然是由主要农产品主导的出口结构。主要农产品类别具有稳定比较优势,非主要农产品具有稳定比较劣势。从贸易供给看,安徽农产品出口变化未改变多数农产品不具比较优势的事实,仅有部分农产品比较劣势变轻;从供求方面看,农产品比较优势仍主要集中在中值点附近,积极变化也仅是部分类别由劣变轻。需要构筑以比较优势为基准的农产品分类贸易发展策略。By using four comparative advantage indices to analyze the changes of comparative advantage of 21 types of agricultural products, it is concluded that Anhui is still the export structure dominated by the main agricultural products in the past 20 years. Major agricultural products have stable comparative advantages, while non-major agricultural products have stable comparative disadvantages. From the perspective of trade supply, the change of Anhui’s agricultural exports has not changed the fact that most agricultural products do not have comparative advantages, only some of them become less disadvantaged;from the perspective of supply and demand, the comparative advantages of agricultural products are still concentrated near the median point, and the positive changes are only part of the categories from the inferior to the lighter. It is necessary to construct the development strategy of classified trade of agricultural products based on comparative advantage.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3