以新带旧:民国初年贵州的司法改革——以《贵州高等审判厅判词辑要》为中心  

Bringing in the Old with the New: Judicial Reform in Guizhou in the Early Years of the Republic of China ——Centered on “The Summary of Judgments from Guizhou Higher Judicial Department”

作　　者：程泽时[1] CHENG Ze-shi(School of Law,Guizhou Normal University,Guiyang 550025,China)

机构地区：[1]贵州师范大学法学院

出　　处：《贵州师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2020年第1期152-160,共9页Journal of Guizhou Normal University(Social Sciences)

摘　　要：民国初年贵州司法改革,在省会设立三级审判厅和检察厅的新式司法系统,省会以外基本维持县知事兼理司法的旧模式。经费不足导致的新旧司法机关的管辖竞争,一定程度上促进了整体民商事裁判水平的提高。高等审判厅覆判县知事审拟的重刑案件,既是以旧带新的体现,又赢得改革合法性和司法权威性的手段。但家族本位、农本与零星的城镇商业化的省情对司法改革内生需求不强,黑恶社会组织、驻军和差役等旧势力起着妨碍作用。In the early years of the Republic of China, Guizhou had its judicial reform by establishing a new judicial system of three-level trial office and procuratorial office in Guiyang, the provincial capital city. But outside Guiyang, the old mode of county governor and judicial office was basically maintained. The competition between the new and old judicial organs, due to the lack of funds, promotes the improvement of the overall level of civil and commercial adjudication to some extent. The review by the court of higher adjudication of the severe punishment cases proposed by the county governor is not only an embodiment of the old with the new, but also a means to win the legitimacy and judicial authority of the reform. However, due to the provincial conditions such as family standard, rural origin, and sporadic commercialization of cities and towns, the internal demand for judicial reform is not strong enough.

关 键 词：司法改革 以新带旧 社会 合法性 

分 类 号：D909.92[政治法律—法学理论]