检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:焦孟頔 JIAO Meng-di(Soochow University,Suzhou 218100,China)
机构地区:[1]苏州大学王健法学院
出 处:《金陵科技学院学报(社会科学版)》2019年第4期68-72,共5页Journal of Jinling Institute of Technology(Social Sciences Edition)
摘 要:学界关于正当防卫一直存在价值理念上的博弈,其中主客观价值的差异也将影响正当防卫的成立。但从自身体系逻辑的自洽性和解释结论的合理性来看,不仅要坚持主客观相统一,而且要将行为无价值二元论作为其重要理论支撑,选取正当防卫应否具备防卫意思之理论,分析其对传统犯罪构成三要素之结构所产生的影响,以探讨犯罪构成对刑法上正当防卫意思之有无影响。The academic circle has always had a game of value about justifiable defense in the value concepts, among them the difference between subjective and objective values will also affect the establishment of justifiable defense. However, judging from the self-consistency of the logic system and the rationality of interpreting conclusions, not only it is necessary to insist on the unity of subjectivity and objectivity, but also take the dualism of behavioral valuelessness as its important the oretical support. The theory of whether justifiable defense should be prepared for defense intention is selected, and its influence on the structure of the three elements of traditional crime is analyzed to explore whether the composition of crime has any influence on the justifiable defense intention in criminal law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.218.79.102