检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:叶甫根尼·维诺库罗夫 胡冰(译)[2] Evgeny Vinokurov
机构地区:[1]欧亚发展与稳定基金 [2]中国社会科学院俄罗斯东欧中亚研究所《俄罗斯东欧中亚研究》
出 处:《俄罗斯东欧中亚研究》2020年第1期52-64,156,共14页Russian,East European & Central Asian Studies
摘 要:欧亚大陆北部和中部的国家(包括欧亚地区最大的经济体俄罗斯和哈萨克斯坦),都认识到“一带一路”倡议的潜在价值。几年来,这些国家逐渐接受“一带一路”倡议各方面内容,期待增加欧亚地区交通基础设施投资并扩大运输量。欧亚地区交通运输量增加不仅能带来丰厚的利润,还能改善欧亚地区内部的互联互通。本文通过估算跨欧亚大陆过境运输量,分析欧亚地区北部和中部国家对“一带一路”倡议及自身利益的认知,以及相关国家对目前和未来的担忧,进而提出既对“一带一路”倡议更有价值又能促进欧亚地区北部和中部国家国际经济和制度能力提高的建议。Countries in Northern and Central Eurasia,including its largest economies,Russia and Kazakhstan,appreciated the potential positive implications of the “Belt and Road” Initiative.Over the last years,they increasingly embraced various aspects of the BRI,most importantly additional investment and rising volumes of trans-Eurasian transit.The latter,apart from being a lucrative business on its own,should eventually lead to better internal connectivity between inner-Eurasian regions.In this paper,we start with the providing estimates on the volumes of trans-Eurasian transit as a starting point.Then,we provide an analysis of Northern and Central Eurasian states’ interests and perceptions on the BRI.We complement this analysis by looking into the real and perceived worries of the involved countries.We conclude by looking into the international economic and institutional capacity which is needed to make the BRI even more valuable for Northern and Central Eurasia.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.117.189.143