PillPick自动化药房管理系统和自动摆药机应用效果对比  

Comparison of the Application Effects Between PillPick Automated Packaging and Dispensing System and Automatic Dispensing Machine

作　　者：洪晓丹[1] 梁嘉俊[1] 邓斌[1] HONG Xiaodan;LIANG Jiajun;DENG Bin(Hui Ya Hospital of the First Affiliated Hospital,Sun Yat-sen University,Huizhou 516081,China;The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou 510080,China)

机构地区：[1]中山大学附属第一医院惠亚医院

出　　处：《中国现代应用药学》2019年第23期2987-2989,共3页Chinese Journal of Modern Applied Pharmacy

摘　　要：目的比较PillPick自动化药房管理系统(PillPick)和自动摆药机(automatic dispensing machine,ADM)的应用效果。方法收集2018年12月住院药房PillPick和ADM的设备参数和使用数据,评价两者的工作效率、差错率以及其他系统功能。结果平均每分钟ADM比PillPick多分包14.92包(串)。ADM的平均"差错率"比PillPick高0.09%。结论PillPick和ADM比较,PillPick的优点是差错率较低、精细化管理水平较高;ADM的优点是成本较低、工作效率较高。OBJECTIVE To compare the application effects between PillPick automated packaging and dispensing system(Pillpick)and automatic dispensing machine(ADM).METHODS Collected device parameters and usage data of PillPick and ADM in the inpatient pharmacy in December 2018,and evaluated their efficiency,error rate,and other system functions.RESULTS ADM dispensed 14.92 packets(strings)per minute more than PillPick on average.The error rate of ADM is 0.09% higher than PillPick’s on average.CONCLUSION PillPick has lower error rate and higher level of drug fine management than ADM.ADM has lower cost and higher efficiency than PillPick.

关 键 词：Pillpick 自动化药房管理系统 自动摆药机 

分 类 号：R95[医药卫生—药学]