《初目》著录《总目》春秋类未收提要小考  

An analysis of the Chunqiu bibliographic recoded in Chumu unseen in Zongmu

作　　者：罗毅峰 LUO Yi-feng(Shanghai Scientific and Technological Literature Press,Shanghai 200040,China)

机构地区：[1]上海科学技术文献出版社

出　　处：《图书馆研究》2019年第6期119-123,共5页Library Research

基　　金：2015年度国家社科基金重大项目“四库提要汇辑汇校汇考”（项目编号15ZDB075）的阶段性成果

摘　　要：《四库全书初次进呈存目》作为早期的四库提要汇编稿,与最后纂定成书的《四库全书总目》差异颇大,篇目的删略以及类目调整就是个中体现之一。以《初目》春秋类著录为例,《春秋贯玉》因内容评价过低致使未能收入《总目》,馆臣又依据图书内容分析,在《总目》中将《春秋列国诸臣传》《春秋名臣传》《春秋列传》《左略》分别调整至合适的分类,纠正了以往目录书分类的疏误,体现了馆臣的目录学思想。尽管与《总目》相比,《初目》还存在一些缺陷,但也不能因此否定其学术贡献。As an early collection of Siku Quanshu bibliographics, Siku Quanshu Chucijinchengcunmu(hereinafter referred to as Chumu) is quite different from Siku Quanshu Zongmu(hereinafter referred to as Zongmu). And the content adjustment is one of the embodiments. Take the Chunqiu records in Chumu for example, Chunqiuguanyu was taken out of Zongmu for its low evaluation. Besides, Siku officials adjust Chunqiulieguo Zhuchenzhuan, Chunqiu Mingchenzhuan, Chunqiu Liezhuan and Zuolve to the appropriate categories in Zongmu, which corrects the classification errors of previous bibliography books and shows the bibliographical thought of officials. Compared with Zongmu, Chumu has some defects, however, its academic contribution should not be ignored.

关 键 词：《四库全书初次进呈存目》 《四库全书总目》 春秋类提要 

分 类 号：G256[文化科学—图书馆学]