我国知识产权侵权损害赔偿司法现状再调查与再思考——基于我国11984件知识产权侵权司法判例的深度分析  

The Reinvestigation and Reconsideration of the Current Judicial Situation of Compensation for IPR Infringement in China

作　　者：詹映[1] Zhan Ying

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学知识产权研究中心

出　　处：《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》2020年第1期191-200,共10页Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law

基　　金：国家社科基金项目(17BFX207)“逆全球化思潮对知识产权国际规则发展的影响及中国应对研究”

摘　　要：通过再度对我国11984件知识产权侵权案例展开实证研究,发现知识产权侵权平均判赔额依然较低,"法定赔偿"占绝对多数的状况仍未改变,惩罚性赔偿在司法实践中虽已出现,但适用率极低。然而,并不能仅仅根据平均判赔额就简单地得出"赔偿低"的结论。深度分析发现,批量案件尤其是商业维权案件的大量存在,对相关统计结果的干扰性影响十分显著,知识产权案件审理负担过重等法外因素的影响亦不可忽视。建议限制商业维权诉讼,优化司法资源配置;建立证据开示制度,明确证据规则和赔偿计算方法;严格"法定赔偿"的适用条件并取消"法定赔偿"限额,同时加强惩罚性赔偿的适用。Through an empirical study on 11984 judicial cases of IPR infringement in China, it is found that the average amount of compensation in the infringement of IPR is still low, and the abuse of "statutory compensation" has not changed. "Punitive damages" has appeared in judicial practice, but the application rate is very low. However, we cannot simply draw the conclusion of "low compensation" on the basis of the average amount of compensation. In-depth analysis found that a large number of batch cases, especially cases of commercial litigation, has a significant impact on the statistical results. The extra-judicial factors such as the overburdens of IPR cases and the institutional reasons should also not be neglected. It is suggested to restrict commercial litigation, establish evidence discovery system, clarify evidence rules and compensation calculation methods, limit the application of statutory compensation and cancel the statutory compensation limit, strengthen the application of punitive damages.

关 键 词：知识产权 侵权赔偿 司法判例 实证分析 

分 类 号：D923.4[政治法律—民商法学]