检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:彭俞超 何山 Peng Yuchao;He Shan
机构地区:[1]中央财经大学金融学院,中央财经大学亚投行研究中心,100081
出 处:《世界经济》2020年第1期47-69,共23页The Journal of World Economy
基 金:国家自然科学基金(71903208);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金;中央财经大学科研创新团队支持计划的资助
摘 要:2018年中国出台资管新规后,影子银行活动受抑制,经济虽“脱虚”但未“向实”。本文通过构建一个内生融资约束的异质性企业模型,研究影子银行限制政策对宏观经济的影响。研究表明,影子银行限制政策一方面导致资本总量下降,减弱了宽松货币政策对投资的刺激效果;另一方面使资本向高效率企业集中,提高了资源配置效率。资管新规虽然提高了经济发展质量,但“一步到位”的监管模式也产生了一定的经济成本。因此,政府应当“堵疏结合”,在限制影子银行的同时,疏通货币政策影响中小和民营企业的传导机制,促进经济高质量发展。After the implementation of the Asset Management Regulation in 2018,shadow banking in China suffered a clear restriction,but the decline of the virtual economy has not resulted in an improvement of the real economy.By constructing a model with heterogeneous firms and endogenous financial constraints,this paper studies the macroeconomic impact of shadow banking restriction policies.Research shows that shadow banking restriction policies not only lead to a decrease in the gross investment and the weakening of the stimulus effect of expansionary monetary policies on investment,but also promote the transfer of capital to high-efficiency firms,thereby improving resource allocation efficiency.While the Asset Management Regulation has been promoting improvement in the quality of economic growth,the“only-one-step”regulation has also led to certain economic costs.Therefore,policy makers should be more concerned about the financing difficulties of SMEs and private enterprises while restricting shadow banking activities,in order to contribute to high-quality economic growth.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.227