全面提高审判质效的制度供给与现实要求——基于全面落实司法责任制的考量  

Institutional Supply and Realistic Requirements of Comprehensively Improving the Trial Quality and Effectiveness——based on the consideration of fully implementing judicial accountability system

作　　者：谭波[1,2] TAN Bo

机构地区：[1]河南工业大学法学院监察法治研究中心 [2]海南大学法学院

出　　处：《求是学刊》2020年第1期113-123,共11页Seeking Truth

基　　金：河南工业大学2017年度省属高校基本科研业务费国家社科基金培育项目（2017SKPY14）

摘　　要：审判质效的提高是全面落实司法责任制的现实考量。需要全面考虑对法院、法官的要求和对配套条件的要求。法院行政领导在前期对审判质效的把关、合议庭作为审判组织作用的合理发挥以及“陪审法官制”的构建,已成为提高审判质效对法院的重要要求。对于法官而言,审判质效来源于具体的操作流程,除了审判礼仪和司法行为的规范之外,还需要强化职责意识和程序指引,同时辅之以责权利相统一的保障制度。从配套制度和条件的建构上,提高审判质效还需要统筹推进法官员额和政法编制合理配置,加强院校合作与书记员培养,进一步深化司法公开。The improvement of trial quality and effectiveness is a realistic consideration for the full implemen⁃tation of judicial accountability system.he requirements for courts,judges and supporting conditions need to be fully considered.In the early stage,the administrative leaders in the court checking the trial quality and ef⁃fectiveness,the collegial panel as a trial organization playing a reasonable role and the construction of“jury judge system”,have become the important requirement for the improvement of the trial quality and effective⁃ness.For a judge,the quality and effectiveness of a trial come from the specific operational process.In addi⁃tion to the standard of trial etiquette and judicial conduct,it is necessary to strengthen the sense of account⁃ability and procedural guidance,supplemented by a unified guarantee system of accountability and rights.In terms of the construction of supporting systems and conditions,in order to improve the quality and effective⁃ness of trials,it is necessary to promote the rational allocation of judges’positions and the compilation of polit⁃ical and legal documents,strengthen the cooperation between colleges and universities and the clerks training,and further deepen judicial openness.

关 键 词：审判质效 员额制 法官 法官助理 

分 类 号：D926.2[政治法律—法学]