论王夫之对《天问》题解阐释的独创性  

On the Originality of Wang Fuzhi’s Interpretation of Tianwen

作　　者：丁海玲[1] Ding Hailing(Baotou Teacher's College,Baotou,Inner Mongolia 014030)

机构地区：[1]包头师范学院

出　　处：《职大学报》2020年第1期22-26,共5页Journal of the Staff and Worker’s University

摘　　要：《天问》是屈原所作的一篇千古奇文,关于“天问”两字的含义,两千年来,一直是楚辞学者们众说纷纭的话题。但是,明末清初大学者王夫之不盲从前人,以一位杰出思想家的眼光,与屈原有着相似境况的感同身受,对《天问》是“问天”还是“天问”以及是否是“呵壁之作”这一命题的阐释作出了独到的分析,此观点至今仍具有启发意义。Tianwen is a masterpiece written by Qu Yuan.For two thousand years,the meaning of"Tianwen"has been a controversial topic among scholars of Chu Ci.However,Wang Fuzhi,a scholar in the late Ming and early Qing Dynasty,was not blind to his predecessors.From the perspective outstanding thinker,he felt the same situation with Qu Yuan.He made an original analysis on whether Tianwen is"Wentian"or"Tianwen"and whether it is"the work of Hebi".This view is still of enlightening significance.

关 键 词：王夫之 《天问》 《楚辞通释》 

分 类 号：I222.3[文学—中国文学]