河南漯河郾城区冬小麦LAI反演结果真实性检验  

Validation of LAI retrieval results of winter wheat in Yancheng,Luohe area of Henan Province

作　　者：袁辉 秦其明[1,2,3] 孙元亨[1] YUAN Hui;QIN Qiming;SUN Yuanheng(Institute of Remote Sensing and Geographical Information System,School of Earth and Space Sciences,Peking University,Beijing 100871,China;Beijing Key Lab of Spatial Information Integration and Its Application,Peking University,Beijing 100871,China;Geographic Information Engineering Technology Center of Geographic Information Basic Software and Application,Beijing 100871,China;96944 Troops of PLA,Beijing 100096,China)

机构地区：[1]北京大学地球与空间科学学院遥感与地理信息系统研究所,北京100871 [2]空间信息集成与3S工程应用北京市重点实验室,北京100871 [3]地理信息基础软件与应用国家测绘地理信息局工程技术研究中心,北京100871 [4]中国人民解放军第96944部队,北京100096

出　　处：《国土资源遥感》2020年第1期162-168,共7页Remote Sensing for Land & Resources

基　　金：国家重点研发项目“粮食作物生长监测诊断与精确栽培技术”第三课题“作物生长与生产力卫星遥感监测预测”(编号:2016YFD0300603)资助。

摘　　要：为对比不同真实性检验方法对高分一号(GF-1)/WFV冬小麦叶面积指数(leaf area index,LAI)反演结果的验证效果,以河南省漯河市郾城区为研究区,分别采用单点测量值验证、多点采样尺度上推验证以及引入高空间分辨率影像验证3种方法对基于GF-1/WFV影像的冬小麦LAI反演结果进行了真实性检验。研究结果表明,3种验证方法得到的均方根误差(root mean square error,RMSE)分别为0. 57,0. 80和0. 46,相关系数分别为0. 885,0. 508和0. 867。由于基于多点采样尺度上推方法对采样点数量及其位置要求较高,因此在本研究采样点较少的情况下精度较低,效果欠佳;另外2种方法精度相对较高,适用性较强,但其中引入高空间分辨率影像验证方法精度更高,更适用于GF-1/WFV影像LAI反演的真实性检验。In order to compare the validation performances of different validation methods on the GF-1/WFV winter wheat LAI retrieval results,the authors chose Yancheng,Luohe City of Henan Province as the study area.Three methods,i.e.,single point ground measurement validation,multi-point upscaling validation,and high-resolution result validation,were tested to verify the performance of winter wheat LAI inversion based on GF-1/WFV image.The results show that the RMSE obtained by the above three verification methods are 0.57,0.80 and 0.46,respectively.The correlation coefficients are 0.885,0.508 and 0.867,respectively.The multi-point upscaling method has higher requirements for the number of sampling points and the position of sampling points.Therefore,the accuracy is low and the effect is poor in the case of fewer sampling points in this study.The other two methods have relatively high precision and applicability,and the validation method with the introduction of high-resolution image achieves higher precision,and hence this method is more suitable for the validation of LAI inversion of GF-1/WFV images.

关 键 词：LAI GF-1/WFV 冬小麦 真实性检验 

分 类 号：TP79[自动化与计算机技术—检测技术与自动化装置]