检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:何海洋 HE Hai-yang
机构地区:[1]中国人民公安大学
出 处:《四川警察学院学报》2020年第1期52-58,共7页Journal of Sichuan Police College
摘 要:民宿行业的快速发展在给人们带来极大便利的同时,也衍生出一系列的不安定因素和问题,中国民宿内卷化的治安控制模式使民宿的治安问题更为突出。同为亚洲国家的日本,其民宿业经过了四十几年的发展,在治安管理方面有着相对成熟的经验。虽两国的情况存在差异,但日本的一些民宿治安管理经验对我国仍然具有借鉴意义。通过从制度规训、组织力量、管理手段等方面进行比较,探讨中日两国在民宿治安管理方面的异同与优缺点,找出适合我国国情的民宿管理方法,有助于提高我国民宿治安管理水平。The rapid development of homestay industry not only brings great convenience to people, but also leads to a series of unstable factors and problems. The internal rolling public security control mode of Chinese homestay makes the public security problem more prominent. Japan, another Asian country, holds a relatively mature experience in public security management after more than 40 years of development. Although there are differences between the two countries, some experience of public security management in Japan can still be used for reference in China. It is conducive for China to find out suitable public security management methods of homestay and improve management level with exploration of similarities and differences, advantages and disadvantages based on the comparison of system and regulation, organization strength and management means in Chinese and Japanese management models.
关 键 词:民宿治安管理模式 日本民宿制度化调控模式 中国民宿组织化调控模式
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15