弗兰克公式研究  

On Frank’s Formula

作　　者：王天一 WANG Tianyi(Department of Law,Taiwan Cheng Kung University,Tainan Taiwan 70101,China)

机构地区：[1]台湾成功大学法律学系

出　　处：《乐山师范学院学报》2020年第1期94-100,共7页Journal of Leshan Normal University

摘　　要：弗兰克公式的名称源于对德文单词弗兰克论述的错误解读,不能望文生义的认为其具有数学公式一样的性质。经过几代学者们共同简化的弗兰克论述,其内容只是弗兰克所有自动性研究的一部分,并不等同于自动性判断主观说。弗兰克论述在学说发展史上具有重要地位,引发了学界广泛且持续的讨论,但它的内容确实有待补充。在将弗兰克论述与现代的失败未遂概念以及其它自动性判断学说相结合之后,它仍然能够在今天为中止犯自动性的判断提供纲领性的指导作用。Frank’s formula derives from the misunderstanding of German phrase Frank’s discussion,so it cannot be treated as a math formula. Scholars of several generations have continuously simplified Frank’s discussion,and then its content is only part of Frank’s voluntariness theory. It does not equal to the subjective theory of voluntariness judgement. Frank’s discussion has a significant position in the history of the development of doctrine,and has raised wide and continuous discussion in academia. But its content surely needs to be supplemented. After combined with modern concept of failed attempt and other voluntariness judgement theories,it can still provide macro helpful guidance for the judgement of voluntariness nowadays.

关 键 词：弗兰克公式 自动性 失败未遂 中止犯 

分 类 号：D904[政治法律—法学理论]