酌定不起诉制度的双重审视  

Double Review of the Discretionary Non-prosecution System

作　　者：陈雪莲 CHEN Xuelian(Law School of Shenzhen University,Shenzhen Guangdong 518060,China)

机构地区：[1]深圳大学法学院

出　　处：《四川文理学院学报》2020年第1期129-134,共6页Sichuan University of Arts and Science Journal

摘　　要：酌定不起诉是我国不起诉制度的内涵之一,最能体现检察机关不起诉裁量权的原理与价值。一方面,酌定不起诉作为一种非刑罚化处理方式,能够通过程序分流的方式合理配置诉讼资源,以达到缩减司法成本、提高诉讼效率的目的,符合诉讼经济原则。另一方面,作为贯彻落实宽严相济刑事司法政策的具体措施,它能有效改造犯罪嫌疑人,促使其早日回归社会。然而,由于"有罪必诉""有罪必罚"观念根深蒂固、酌定不起诉的适用条件难以把握、运行程序较为繁琐、不起诉检察制度和考评制度异化、运行保障机制不健全等原因,导致司法实践中酌定不起诉适用有限而未能发挥出其应有功能。因此,在分析酌定不起诉适用现状的基础上对该制度进行改良意义重大。Discretionary non-prosecution is one of the connotations of the non-prosecution system in China,which best embodies the principle and value of the discretion non-prosecution of the procuratorial organ.On the one hand,discretionary non-prosecution,as a non-penalty treatment method,can reasonably allocate litigation resources through procedural diversion,so as to reduce judicial cost and improve litigation efficiency,which conforms to the economic principle of litigation.On the other hand,as a specific measure to implement the policy of tempering justice with mercy,it can effectively reform criminal suspects and promote their early return to society.However,the notion of“guilty must be prosecuted”and“guilty must be punished”is firm,the applicable condition is difficult to grasp,the program is more complicated,the procuratorial system of non-prosecution and appraisal system is dissimilated,and the operation guarantee mechanism is not sound,so in the judicial practice the discretionary non-prosecution system is limited and fail to perform its due functions.Therefore,it is of great significance to improve the system on the basis of analyzing the application status of discretionary non-prosecution.

关 键 词：不起诉裁量权 酌定不起诉 适用条件 程序分流 

分 类 号：C03[社会学]