检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周维忠[1] ZHOU Weizhong(Department of Burn Orthopedics,Xingyi People's Hospital,Xingyi Guizhou 562400,China)
机构地区:[1]贵州省兴义市人民医院烧伤整形科
出 处:《中国继续医学教育》2020年第5期102-104,共3页China Continuing Medical Education
摘 要:目的研究整复手术对颈部瘢痕挛缩畸形的治疗效果。方法在本次研究中,将于2015年3月-2018年12月期间在本科接受颈部瘢痕挛缩畸形治疗的96例患者纳为研究对象,依照随机抽签分组的方法,根据对其实施的修复方法的不同,将其均等分为对照组和观察组,对照组行全厚皮片移植修复,观察组行皮瓣修复治疗,将两组患者的综合效果及修复满意度作为观察指标。结果观察组修复效果及满意度显著优于对照组(P <0.05)。结论对于颈部瘢痕挛缩畸形患者的临床整复治疗来说,皮瓣修复治疗方法较全厚皮片移植修复方法有着更好的临床效果。Objective To study the therapeutic effect of reconstructive surgery on neck scar contracture deformity. Methods In this study, from March 2015 to December 2018 in our department during the 96 cases of neck scar contracture deformity treated patients as the research object, according to the method of random draw grouped according to the different repair methods for its implementation, it is equally divided into control group and observation group, control group full thickness skin graft to repair, observation group treated skin flap to repair, the composite results of two groups of patients as observation indexes and repair satisfaction. Results Repair effect and satisfaction of the observation group were significantly better than that of the control group(P < 0.05). Conclusion For the clinical rehabilitation of patients with scar contracture deformity of the neck, the flap repair method has a better clinical effect than the fullthickness skin graft repair method. Therefore, it is worth popularizing.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.223.239.228