检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄秋凤 李月娥[1] 张钊铭 谭建芳 HUANG Qiu-feng;LI Yue-e;ZHANG Zhao-ming;TAN Jian一fang(School of Economics and Management,China University of Geosciences(Wuhan),Wuhan 430074,China)
机构地区:[1]中国地质大学(武汉)经济管理学院
出 处:《资源开发与市场》2020年第3期291-297,330,共8页Resource Development & Market
摘 要:以2014-2017年我国A股上市公司数据为样本,实证研究了两控区政策下本地与邻近环境规制强度对本地企业生产率的影响。结果表明:本地及邻近环境规制与本地企业生产率均呈"U"型关系;两控区较严格的环境规制强度促进了该地区的企业生产率,非两控区则反之。与非国有企业相比,国有企业对环境规制与生产率的促进作用更加显著。研究结论揭示了环境规制的生产率效应,为政府针对两控区、非两控区精确定制环境规制政策提供了科学参考。Based on the data of China’s A-share listed companies from 2014 to 2017,this paper empirically researched the impact of local and neighboring environmental regulation intensity on the productivity of local enterprises based on the two-control zone policy.The results showed that local and neighboring environmental regulations and local enterprises’productivity rendered a"U"-type relationship.The stricter environmental regulation of the two-control zones promoted the productivity of enterprises in the region,while the non-two control zones were the opposite.Further discussion found that state-owned enterprises promoted environmental regulation and productivity more significantly than non-state-owned enterprises.This paper uncovered the productivity effects of environmental regulation,and provided guidelines for the government to accurately customize appropriate environmental regulation policies for two-control zones and non-two-control zones.
分 类 号:X322[环境科学与工程—环境工程] F425[经济管理—产业经济]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49