“国族”与“性别”纠缠下的女界改造与女性主体性重构——近代妇女运动与民族主义运动的双重变奏  

Female Reform and Subjectivity Reconstruction under the Context of “Nation” and “Gender”: The Double Variation of Modern Women’s Movement and Nationalist Movement

作　　者：施文斐 SHI Wen-fei(Beifang University of Nationalities,Yinchuan 750021,China)

机构地区：[1]北方民族大学

出　　处：《山东女子学院学报》2020年第2期14-24,共11页Journal of Shandong Women＇s University

基　　金：北方民族大学2019年科研一般项目“构建·想象·日常:域外镜像与国族视域下的近代妇女运动与女性观变迁研究”(项目编号:2019XYZJC03)

摘　　要：妇女解放运动与民族主义运动的双轨并进是中国近代政治叙事的重要特征。与民族主义运动的广泛结合为妇女运动提供了宝贵的合法化途径,但过度依附于国族立场却也导致了女性自身性别立场的极大丧失,从而使其难以摆脱国族话语规制下的工具化境遇。然而,也正是在这一纠缠着国族与政治,且又饱涨着性别张力的过程中,女性立场上的性别主体意识开始了艰难而又漫长的觉醒之旅,其中关涉到的一系列性别问题值得我们深思。这一历史时期积累下的种种经验教训也都成为宝贵的遗产留给了五四时期再度复兴的女权运动,成为下一阶段中国妇女运动可资利用的先期资源。The duel orbits of women’s liberation movement and the nationalist movement is an important feature of modern Chinese gender political narrative.All-round cooperation with nationalist movement justified women’s movement,but excessive reliance on a national position resulted in the loss of women’s gender position,thus it is difficult to avoid its instrumental position in national discourse.However,it is also in this haunted national and political process,complete with gender tension,women’s gender awareness began its long and difficult journey of awakening,in which a variety of gender issues are worth our cautious consideration.Abundant experiences and lessons accumulated in this historical period became heritage for renaissance feminist movement during the May Fourth period,and precious legacy for Chinese women’s movement to come.

关 键 词：女界改造运动 女权革命论 妇女参政运动 “新女性”构想 传统性别秩序 

分 类 号：D442.9[政治法律—政治学]