检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:桂林翠 GUI Lin-cui(Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China)
机构地区:[1]中国人民大学
出 处:《山东女子学院学报》2020年第2期91-96,共6页Journal of Shandong Women's University
摘 要:法定产假工资的政策设计会影响参保者的现金收益水平。然而,国内文献对我国法定产假工资讨论较少。根据安德森的福利国家体制分类,对爱尔兰、英国、德国、芬兰的法定产假工资政策进行比较发现,四个国家的政策在多渠道筹资、按照女雇员的个人平均工资计发待遇等方面存在共性,在筹资比例、资格条件、待遇支付等方面存在差异。与欧洲政策不同,中国法定产假工资的筹资主体单一、待遇给付与同一单位内所有员工的平均收入挂钩。中国法定产假工资政策存在一些问题,亟需有关部门采取相应措施。The design of statutory maternity leave policies can affect the level of cash benefits received by the insured.However,there is little discussion about the maternity leave policies in China.According to the welfare regimes developed by Andersen,this paper compares maternity leave policies in Ireland,United Kingdom,Germany and Finland.Policies of these countries showed some similarities in funding from different channels,calculating benefits according to average earnings of female employees.There are also some differences in the contributions,eligibility and benefits.Different from these foreign policies,the maternity leave policy in China is funded from single contributor and calculated benefits based on average earnings of female employees from a same employer.With regard to the problems of maternity leave policy in China,this paper makes some corresponding suggestions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28