论人民陪审员专职事实审的立法进路  

On the Legislative Approach of the Full-time Factual Trials of the People’s Jurors

作　　者：徐玮琦 XU Wei-qi(Law School,Xiangtan University,Xiangtan,Hunan 411105)

机构地区：[1]湘潭大学法学院

出　　处：《牡丹江大学学报》2020年第2期88-92,共5页Journal of Mudanjiang University

摘　　要：《人民陪审员法》就陪审员职权做了较大改革,在保留“共享模式”的同时,引入“分权模式”和“建议模式”,创立了中国特色的陪审制度,具有很大的进步意义。但不可忽略的是,此次改革赋予三人合议庭中人民陪审员以法律审职权,加剧了司法民主化与司法专业化间的不平衡,还会产生削减法官专业化优势、人民陪审员欠缺法律专业性以及司法责任制适用难等问题。为制衡司法民主与司法专业间的矛盾,应从事实审与法律审的分离,人民陪审员专职事实认定方面完善立法。The"People's Jury Law"made a major reform on the jury's powers.While retaining the"sharing model",it introduced the"decentralization model"and the"recommendation model"and created a jury system with Chinese characteristics,which has great progressive significance.However,it should not be overlooked that this reform has given the people's jurors in the three collegiate benches the right to legal examination,which has aggravated the imbalance between judicial democratization and judicial specialization.It also has the effect of reducing the professionalism of judges and the lack of laws for people's jurors.Professionalism and the application of judicial responsibility system are difficult.In order to balance the contradiction between judicial democracy and judicial profession,we should separate the factual trial from the legal trial,and improve the legislation for the jury's full-time fact finding.

关 键 词：司法民主化 司法专业化 事实审 法律审 司法责任制 

分 类 号：D920.4[政治法律—法学]