中国博士后科学基金资助效益——基于SCI论文产出的文献计量学分析  

Funding Benefit of the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation: A Bibliometric Analysis Based on SCI Paper Output

作　　者：付新彦 张玉韬 王修来 Fu Xinyan;Zhang Yutao;Wang Xiulai(Postdoctoral Research Station of Eastern Theater Command General Hospital,Nanjing 210002,China;Digital Talent Research Center,College of Economics and Management,Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,Nanjing 210016,China)

机构地区：[1]东部战区总医院博士后科研工作站,江苏南京210002 [2]南京航空航天大学经济与管理学院数字人才研究中心,江苏南京210016

出　　处：《科技管理研究》2020年第2期84-92,共9页Science and Technology Management Research

基　　金：江苏省第十四批“六大人才高峰”创新人才团队项目“大数据环境下数字人才服务平台研发与应用”(TD-RJFW-005)

摘　　要：基于Web of Science数据库,对2008—2018年中国博士后科学基金(CPSF)SCI论文产出数量、被引频次、作者机构、学科门类、期刊来源、区域分布等进行研究分析,利用SPSS 21.0进行配对资料Wilcoxon检验,验证相关参数的显著性。研究发现:2008—2018年共发表CPSF-SCI论文59434篇,高水平科研产出越来越多,高被引论文水平略高于全球基准值,CPSF-SCI论文数量与CPSF资助人数在机构、学科门类、区域分布上基本一致,不存在显著性差异;同时,也存在CPSF-SCI论文人均数量少、资助成本高、刊载期刊总体水平不高、学科门类分布不均、区域发展不平衡等问题。Based on the Web of Science,this paper analyzes the number of SCI papers produced by China Postdoctoral Science Foundation(CPSF)in 2008-2018,introduces SPSS21.0 as statistical analysis tool,and uses Wilcoxon test to verify the significant of some parameters.From 2008 to 2018,59434 CPSF-SCI papers are published,the highlevel scientific research outputs of CPSF are increasing,the level of high-cited papers is sEghtly higher than the global benchmark value,and the number of CPSF-SCI and the number of CPSF-funded are basically the same in terms of institutions,disciplines,regional distribution,and there is no significant difierence.At the same time,there are also some problems,such as fewer CPSF-SCI papers per capita,the higher cost per CPSF-SCI paper,the lower level of journals published in CPSF-SCI,the uneven distribution of disciplines,and the imbalance of regional development,etc.

关 键 词：中国博士后科学基金 SCI论文 资助效益 文献计量法 

分 类 号：G250.252[文化科学—图书馆学] G311