检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙卫国[1] 孙中奇 Sun Weiguo;Sun Zhongqi
机构地区:[1]南开大学历史学院
出 处:《史学月刊》2020年第2期125-136,共12页Journal of Historical Science
基 金:国家社科基金项目“东亚视野下万历朝鲜之役研究”(19BZS025)
摘 要:近百年来,中国学术界对万历朝鲜之役的研究历程,呈现出这样的特征:由不受重视到重视;由受严重政治干扰到追求严谨的学术研究;由只关注参战的明朝将士对到战争的全面认识。相当长的一段时间,研究者不多、学术专著少、研究成果以专题论文为主;重在叙述史实、排比史料。进入新世纪以后,涌现一批研究者,全方位运用中日朝三国史料、采用东亚视野、新文化史的解读方法,全面推进本论题的研究,学术活动日渐融入国际学术的阵营之中。未来对这场战争的研究,还有相当广阔的学术空间,不久的将来一定会涌现出颇具学术底蕴、全面系统阐述这场战争的中文学术专著。During the past almost 100 years,the research history of the Wanli Korean War in Chinese academic circles has displayed such characteristics:from being ignored to being valued;from undergoing serious political interference to pursuing rigorous academic research;and from focusing on the Ming generals and soldiers fighting in the war to a more comprehensive understanding of the war.For a long time there hadn’t been many researchers and academic monographs in this field,while most research results were mainly articles focusing on describing historical facts and listing historical materials.The situation has changed since the turn of the 21 st century.A group of researchers have emerged who can use the historical materials of China,Japan and Choson Korea,and adopt the East Asia vision as well as the interpretative method of new cultural history to promote the research on this subject.As a result,their academic activities have been increasingly integrated into the international academic camps.In the future,there will be a fairly broad academic space for the study of this war,and some Chinese academic monographs with comprehensive and systematic interpretations of the war will certainly come out.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117