《汉书·艺文志》小说家《伊尹说》等七种依托考论  

On Seven Pretexts such as Novelist Yiyin Says in Bibliography of Book of Han

作　　者：孙振田 Sun Zhentian(Xingyi Normal University for Nationalities,School of Literature and Communication,Xingyi 562400,China)

机构地区：[1]兴义民族师范学院文学与传媒学院

出　　处：《西北民族大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2020年第1期147-154,共8页Journal of Northwest Minzu University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“《汉书·艺文志》注解长编与研究”(项目编号：11XTQ013)

摘　　要：《汉书·艺文志》中的小说家《伊尹说》等七种,班固或注云依托,或虽不注云依托而事实上确为依托。研究者多以辨伪学的视角将相关依托视为伪造,原因则解为借古人以重己说或市名。这些依托情况复杂,不当以后世辨伪学的伪造视之;以借古人以重己说、市名等解释其原因,应持以辩证的态度。将《汉志·艺文志》小说家之依托纳入辨伪学的视野进行考察,也应慎之又慎;班固在辨伪学史上的地位及所称依托的辨伪学研究价值,尚需重新界定。讨论《伊尹说》等的依托,有助于了解早期民间社会知识生产的情形、小说家的兴起或其早期发展,及丰富对代言体的认识等。As for seven pretexts such as novelistYiyin Says in Bibliography of Book of Han,Ban Gu annotated them as pretexts,or did not annotated as pretext but they were actually pretexts in essence.From the perspective of differentiating the false,most researchers regarded the relevant pretexts as fabrications,and the explanation is attaching importance to oneself or seeking fame.These pretexts are complicated,and should not be regarded as fabrications.As for explanations such as attaching importance to oneself or seeking fame,we should adopt a dialectal attitude.While taking these novelist in the very work into the framework of differentiating the false,we should be very cautious.We should redefine Ban Gu’s status in the history of differentiating the false and the academic value of these pretext.The study of pretexts such as Yiyin Says will help us understand the knowledge production in ancient society,the rise of novelist and their early development,and the style of mouthpiece.

关 键 词：《汉书·艺文志》 小说家 依托 伪造 市名 知识生产 小说家起源 代言体 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]