浙江山矾属的分类修订  

Taxonomic Revision of the Genus Symplocos Jacq. from Zhejiang Province

作　　者：陈征海 陈贤兴[2] 李根有 谢文远[1] 陈锋[1] CHEN Zhenghai;CHEN Xianxing;LI Genyou;XIE Wenyuan;CHEN Feng(Zhejiang Monitoring Center of Forest Resources,Hangzhou,China 310020;College of Life and Environmental Science,Wenzhou University,Wenzhou,China 325035;Jiyang College,Zhejiang Agriculture and Forestry University,Zhuji,China 311800)

机构地区：[1]浙江省森林资源监测中心,浙江杭州310020 [2]温州大学生命与环境科学学院,浙江温州325035 [3]浙江农林大学暨阳学院,浙江诸暨311800

出　　处：《温州大学学报（自然科学版）》2020年第1期47-55,共9页Journal of Wenzhou University(Natural Science Edition)

基　　金：浙江省财政专项项目(335006-2013-0001,335010-2015-0005)

摘　　要：本文对浙江产山矾属Symplocos Jacq.的若干疑难分类群进行了研究,结果表明:白檀S.paniculata (Thunb.ex Murray) Miq.系S.tanakana Nakai之误定;阿里山山矾S.arisanensis Hayata为独立的种系,历史资料记载浙江产银色山矾S.subconnata Hand.-Mazz.系其之误定;总状山矾S.botryantha Franch.与S.sumuntia Buch.-Ham.ex D.Don属于区别明显的不同种系,历史资料记载浙江产美山矾S.decoraHance系总状山矾S.botryanthaFranch.之误定;厘清了山矾S.caudataWall.exG.Don与S.sumuntia Buch.-Ham.ex D.Don的关系,恢复了前者的种级地位;南岭山矾S.confusa Brand与S.pendula Wight var.hirtistylis (Clarke) Noot.属于区别明显的不同种系,赞同将S.sonoharae Koidz.var.oblonga H.Nagamasu作为南岭山矾的异名;恢复了叶萼山矾S.phyllocalyx Clarke的种级地位;厘清了S.kuroki H.Nagamasu、四川山矾S.setchuensis Brand和光亮山矾S.lucida (Thunb.) Siebold et Zucc.的关系,并将前者作为合法名称;厘清了黄牛奶树S.theophrastifolia Siebold et Zucc.、越南山矾S.cochinchinensis (Lour.)S.Moore和S.laurina Wall.ex G.Don的关系,采用前者作为其合法名称;厘清了桂樱山矾S.prunifolia Siebold、黑山山矾S.heishanensis Hayata et Zucc.与海桐山矾S.pittosporifolia Hand.-Mazz.的关系,将S.heishanensis Hayata作为S.prunifolia Siebold et Zucc.的异名。同时报道了2个植物分布新记录,其中朝鲜白檀S.coreana (H.Lév.) Ohwi属于中国分布新记录,琉璃白檀S.sawafutagi H.Nagamasu属于华东分布新记录。In this paper, some difficult taxa of Symplocos Jacq.from Zhejiang were studied, and the results show: S.paniculata(Thunb.ex Murray) Miq.was a false identification of S.tanakana Nakai;S.arisanensis Hayata was an independent species, and S.subconnata Hand.-Mazz.in Zhejiang’s historical data was its misidentification;S.botryantha Franch.and S.sumuntia Buch.-Ham.ex D.Don belong to distinctly different species, and S.decora Hance in Zhejiang’s historical data was a false identification of S.botryantha Franch.;the relationship between S.cauata Wall.ex G.Don and S.sumuntia Buch.-Ham.ex D.Don was clarified, and the species rank of the former was restored;S.confusa Brand and S.pendula Wight var.hirtistylis(Clarke) Noot.belong to distinctly different species, and S.sonoharae Koidz.var.oblonga H.Nagamasu as a synonym of S.confusa Brand was advocated;the species rank of S.phyllocalyx Clarke was restored;the relationship between S.kuroki H.Nagamasu, S.setchuensis Brand and S.lucida(Thunb.) Siebold et Zucc.was clarified, and the former was taken as the legitimate name;the relationship between S.theophrastifolia Siebold et Zucc., S.cochinchinensis(Lour.) S.Moore and S.laurina Wall.ex G.Don was clarified, and the former was taken as the legitimate name;the relationship between S.prunifolia Siebold et Zucc., S.heishanensis Hayata and S.pittosporifolia Hand.-Mazz.was clarified, and S.heishanensis Hayata was taken as a new synonym for S.prunifolia Siebold et Zucc.In addition, two new records were reported, among which S.coreana(H.Lév.) Ohwi was a new record in China, and S.sawafutagi H.Nagamasu was a new record in East China.

关 键 词：山矾属 分类修订 新异名 新记录 浙江 

分 类 号：Q949[生物学—植物学]