检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙冬营[1,2] 佘靖雯 褚钰 许叶军[2] 王慧敏[2] SUN Dong-ying;SHE Jing-wen;CHU Yu;XU Ye-jun;WANG Hui-min(School of Management,Jiangsu University,Zhenjiang 212013,China;Institute of Management Science,Hohai University,Nanjing 211100,China;School of Management Engineering,Henan University of Engineering,Zhengzhou 451191,China)
机构地区:[1]江苏大学管理学院,江苏镇江212013 [2]河海大学管理科学研究所,江苏南京211100 [3]河南工程学院管理工程学院,河南郑州451191
出 处:《运筹与管理》2019年第12期124-129,共6页Operations Research and Management Science
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(71704068,71804042,71603116,71433003);中国博士后科学基金资助项目(2017M621621);江苏省社会科学基金资助项目(17GLC006);江苏高校哲学社会科学基金资助项目(2017SJB1067);江苏省博士后科研资助计划(2018K198C)
摘 要:水资源配置的多属性特征使得在方案综合评价中依据不同的聚合方法,能够获得不完全一致的方案排序结果。本文从水资源配置方案评价的决策矩阵及方案排序结果中的信息量大小入手,利用信息熵理论和斯皮尔曼等级相关系数提出衡量水资源配置方案综合评价中信息损失的香农斯皮尔曼测度。并构造由2种权重(熵权法权重、证据理论权重)与3种评价模型(简单加权法、模糊优选法、TOPSIS)组合而成的6种综合评价模型。最后,将香农斯皮尔曼测度运用到天津市水资源配置方案综合评价过程中的信息损失的衡量,并与文献中的综合评价模型所得结果进行比较。结果表明,采用证据理论权重-模糊优选评价模型所得评价结果的绝对信息损失和相对信息损失最小。通过水资源配置方案综合评价中的信息损失测度研究,能够使得水资源配置方案综合评价过程更加透明,并为决策部门选取理想的水资源配置方案综合评价方法提供决策支持。The characterof multiple attributes in water resource allocation makes the ranking of schemes incompletely consistent by using different aggregating methods.This paper discusses the quantity of information loss from given decision-making metrics to ranking results.Then information entropy theory and Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient are adopted to measure information loss in evaluation of water resource allocation schemes and the Shannon-Spearman measure is proposed.Six composite evaluation models are constructed by combining two weight sets(weight based on entropy and weight based on evidence theory)and three evaluation models(namely sample additive weighting,fuzzy selection method and TOPSIS).Finally,the Shannon-Spearman measure is adopted to calculate information loss in the process of composite evaluation of Tianjin water resource allocation schemes.And composite evaluationresultsare compared with a given composite evaluation model in reference.The results show that the result from combining weight based on entropy and fuzzy selection method obtains the least absolute/relative information loss in seven results.Through the measure of information loss in evaluation of water resource allocation schemes,it could make evaluation process more transparent and provide policy-making departmentwith decision support for choosing ideal composite evaluation method of water resource allocation schemes.
关 键 词:信息熵 斯皮尔曼等级相关系数 水资源配置方案 综合评价 信息损失
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.21.35.68