《三国志旁证》体裁考论  

On the Genre of Circumstantial Evidence to the History of the Three Kingdoms

作　　者：白帆 BAI Fan(National Library of China,Beijing 100034,China)

机构地区：[1]中国国家图书馆

出　　处：《西华师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2020年第1期34-38,共5页Journal of China West Normal University:Philosophy & Social Sciences

摘　　要：梁章钜《三国志旁证》常被视之为初具集解性质的总结之作。然而,将该书与《三国志》研究集大成之作、亦是成就极高的集解体史注《三国志集解》对比可见,无论是征引前人成果的完整程度还是著述的宗旨、研究的方法,均存在根本性差异。《三国志旁证》或具集解面貌,但其体裁并不符合集解体史注的特点,故不宜称初具集解性质。Liang Zhangju’s Circumstantial Evidence to the History of the Three Kingdoms is regarded as a preliminary summary of the variorum historical note.Comparing this book with Annotations to the History of the Three Kingdoms,the author finds that both of them have fundamental differences in the completeness of quoting predecessors achievements,the purpose of writing and the research method.This book preliminarily has the characteristics of collected commentaries.However,its genre does not conform to the characteristics of variorum historical note,it s inadvisable to conclude that this book has preliminarily the nature of collected commentaries.

关 键 词：梁章钜 《三国志旁证》 《三国志集解》 集解体史注 

分 类 号：I207[文学—中国文学]