检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:林丽清[1] LIN Liqing(First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University,Xiamen 361003,China)
机构地区:[1]厦门大学附属第一医院
出 处:《中外医学研究》2020年第1期89-90,共2页CHINESE AND FOREIGN MEDICAL RESEARCH
摘 要:目的:探究癌症患者靶向药物治疗中综合护理干预的效果。方法:选取笔者所在医院肿瘤科2017年3月-2018年3月收治的癌症患者94例,经随机数字表法将其分为对照组及观察组,各47例。对照组实施并发症护理,观察组在对照组的基础上实施综合护理干预。比较两组护理前后生活质量及护理满意度。结果:护理前两组生活质量评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);护理后观察组生活质量评分高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组护理总满意度高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:癌症患者靶向药物治疗期间配合综合护理干预可提升患者生活质量及护理满意度。Objective:To explore the effect of comprehensive nursing intervention in targeted drug therapy for cancer patients.Method:A total of 94 cancer patients admitted in the Oncology Department of our hospital from March 2017 to March 2018 were selected.The patients were divided into the control group and the observation group by random number table method,with 47 cases in each group.The control group was given complications nursing,while the observation group was given comprehensive nursing intervention on the basis of the control group.The quality of life and nursing satisfaction before and after nursing were compared between the two groups.Result:There was no significant difference in quality of life score between the two groups before nursing(P>0.05).After nursing,the quality of life score of the observation group was higher than that of the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The total nursing satisfaction of the observation group was higher than that of the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:The quality of life and nursing satisfaction of cancer patients can be improved by comprehensive nursing intervention in targeted drug therapy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.220.9.72