存疑不起诉案件中的证据问题——以A市检察机关2016～2018年案件为样本  

Issues of Evidence Related to Suspected Non-prosecution Cases: A Sample of Cases Conducted by the Procuratorate Departments of City A from 2016 to 2018

作　　者：曹威[1] 曹欧艳 CAO Wei;CAO Ou-yan(Law and Policy Research Office of Shanghai People's Procuratorate,Shanghai 200020;Economical Law College,Southwest University of Political Science and law,Chongqing 401120)

机构地区：[1]上海市人民检察院法律政策研究室,上海200020 [2]西南政法大学经济法学院,重庆401120

出　　处：《中国刑警学院学报》2019年第6期14-20,共7页Journal of Criminal Investigation Police University of China

摘　　要：存疑不起诉最主要的问题在于“证据不足”。基于对A市检察机关2016~2018年办理存疑不起诉案件的实证分析,证据不足应包括证据不充分、证据不确实两个方面,究其原因,主要是受法律规定的原则性、案件本身的局限性、侦查取证的随意性等因素影响。司法实践中,应进一步明确证据不足的范围和标准、提高侦查取证能力水平、完善检察引导侦查取证机制,以降低存疑不起诉率,实现打击犯罪与保障人权的双益。The main problem of non-prosecution in doubt lies in“insufficient evidence”.Based on doubts about the handling of non-prosecution cases in procuratorate departments of city A in 2016-2018,insufficient evidence should include two aspects:insufficient evidence and inaccurate evidence.The main reason is to accept the principle of law,the limitation of the case itself,the arbitrariness of investigation and evidence collection and other factors.In judicial practice,it should be further clarified according to the insufficient scope and standard,improve the level of investigation and evidence collection ability,improve the mechanism of procuratorial guidance investigation and evidence collection,so as to reduce the rate of suspected non prosecution,and to achieve the dual benefits of fighting against crime and safeguarding human rights.

关 键 词：存疑不起诉制度 证据不足 统一证据标准 检察机关审前主导 

分 类 号：D920[政治法律—法学]