贪污受贿犯罪量刑均衡问题实证研究  

Empirical Research on Balanced Sentencing Mechanism for Crimes of Corruption and Bribery

作　　者：陈磊[1] Chen Lei

机构地区：[1]最高人民检察院检察理论研究所

出　　处：《政法论坛》2020年第1期89-105,共17页Tribune of Political Science and Law

基　　金：国家社科基金青年项目(13CFX053);国家社科基金重大课题(17ZDA135)的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：量刑是否均衡直接关系到社会大众对量刑公正、司法公正的观感,在反腐败问题上更是意义重大。通过对"刑法修正案(九)"适用前后778件生效判决书统计分析发现,贪污受贿犯罪存在量刑轻缓化和量刑情节适用偏差、"量刑扎堆"造成刑罚阶梯效应失灵、区域量刑差异、两罪量刑差异等现象。刑法以及司法解释的修改部分解决了上述问题,仍留有定罪起点数额提高不够、刑罚幅度不宽、情节规定不合理、调节幅度不明确等问题未解决。贪污受贿犯罪量刑失衡现象由多种复杂因素叠加而成,应考虑从入罪数额标准、地区平衡、刑罚结构等角度构建贪污受贿犯罪的量刑均衡机制。Whether sentencing is balanced or not is directly related to the public’s perception of sentencing justice and judicial justice,and it is of considerable significance on the issue of anti-corruption.Through the statistical analysis of 778 effective judgments before and after the application of amendment(IX)to the Criminal Law,it is found that there are some phenomena in the cases of embezzlement and bribery,such as the leniency of punishment,the application deviation of the circumstances of punishment,the failure of penalty step effect caused by"piling up of punishment",the difference of regional punishment,and the different punishments between the two crimes.The revision of the Criminal Law and judicial interpretation has solved part of the above problems;however,there are still some unresolved issues,such as the insufficient increase of the starting point for conviction,the narrow range of punishment,the unreasonable provision of the circumstances,and the unclear range of adjustment.The imbalanced punishment of embezzlement and bribery crimes are caused by a variety of complicated factors.The construction of a balanced punishment mechanism of fraud and bribery crimes should be considered from the perspectives of the standard of the numbers of crimes,regional balance,and penalty structure.

关 键 词：贪污受贿犯罪 量刑均衡 刑法修正 实证研究 

分 类 号：D924.392[政治法律—刑法学] D924.1[政治法律—法学]