何谓科学的方法论和鉴别是非真伪的科学标准——从“史”“论”之争纠结难解谈起  

What Is Scientific Methodology and Scientific Criteria for Distinguishing Right from Wrong?——On the Difficult Solution of the Debate between “History” and “Theory”

作　　者：庞卓恒[1] PANG Zhuo-heng(School of History and Culture,Tianjin Normal University,Tianjin 300387,China)

机构地区：[1]天津师范大学历史文化学院

出　　处：《河北学刊》2020年第1期77-82,共6页Hebei Academic Journal

摘　　要："史"与"论"孰轻孰重之争,在中国被称为"史料派"与"史观派"之争;在西方学术界称为"事实"与"解释"孰为轻重之争。争议迄今未见疏解途径,原因在于找不到一个可判断是非真伪的标准,其结果总是导致"各说各理"的相对主义。唯有求助于马克思的科学历史观和方法论,才能摆脱这一困境。The disputes over the importance of "history"and "theory"are called the disputes between "historical data school"and "historical view school"in China. It is called "facts"and "explanations"in western academic circles. So far,there is no way to settle the dispute,because there is no standard to judge whether it is true or false. The result always leads to relativism of "different theories and different principles". Only by resorting to Marx’s scientific view of history and methodology can we get rid of this dilemma.

关 键 词：“史”“论”之争 马克思 科学方法论 是非真伪标准 

分 类 号：K03[历史地理—历史学]