基于改进决策功能派的智库智囊团评价IAO模型及指标体系构建  

IAO Model and Index System Construction of Think Tank Evaluation Based on Improved Decision Functionalist

作　　者：杨佳鑫 赵静[1] Yang Jiaxin

机构地区：[1]西南科技大学经济管理学院

出　　处：《情报理论与实践》2020年第1期112-118,共7页Information Studies:Theory & Application

基　　金：四川省社会科学研究“十三五”规划2018年度项目“四川省军民融合科技创新中图书情报机构服务能力研究”的成果，项目编号:SC18B144

摘　　要：[目的/意义]智库建设离不开智囊团的打造,智囊团水平决定智库的水平,依据决策功能派"最有效地表述具有非确定性的决策过程"的特点能较好吻合智库智囊团非确定性的决策过程的特点,创新运用其来研究智库资政的最具原创动力的核心部分--智囊团,不仅可以丰富智囊团资政分析的理论视角,还可以通过模型和指标的构建来指导智库智囊团的资政实践。[方法/过程]将决策功能派提出的行动维度细分为思维和实践两方面、结果维度融入情报要素、根据影响智囊团信息转化为情报能力的要素,构成评价的情报、行动、结果三个维度的一级指标,同时形成评价智库智囊团的IAO三维立体模型。在二级指标设计上,依照信息转化为情报的增值原理量化了情报维度的自有信息量和自有信息量转化效果;按照认识指导实践的理论从思维和行动思考"行动"维度构成;并根据南京大学中国智库研究与评价中心设计的MRPA智库专家测评指标,量化了结果维度中智囊团对决策的主观期待价值,最后结合调研与SPSS分析定量化筛选核心指标,从而形成I、A、O三个维度具体的指标体系。[结果/结论] IAO模型为描述和评价智囊团非确定性的决策过程提供了一个新的可观察和可操作的参照指标,强化了智库发展中人的核心地位与作用,拓展了智库评价的视野和维度。[Purpose/significance] The construction of think tank is inseparable from the building of brain trust. The level of brain trust determines the level of think tank. According to the characteristics of the decision-making functional school,which is the most effective way to express the uncertain decision-making process,it can better match the characteristics of the uncertain decision-making process of brain trust and innovatively use it to study the brain trust,the most original core part of think tank management,can not only enrich the theoretical perspective of brain trust management analysis,but also guide the management practice of brain trust through the construction of model and indicators. [Method/process] The action dimension proposed by the decisionmaking functionalist is divided into two aspects: thinking and practice,result dimension is integrated into intelligence elements,and elements that influence the ability of think tank to translate information into intelligence. It constitutes the first-level indicators of the three dimensions of intelligence,action and result evaluated in this paper. At the same time,it forms a three-dimensional IAO model for evaluating brain trust. In the design of secondary indicators,according to the value-added principle of information transformation into intelligence,we quantify the transformation effect of information dimension’s own information quantity and its own information quantity;in accordance with the theory of knowledge guidance practice,we construct the dimension of thinking and action thinking"action";and in accordance with the expert evaluation index of MRPA think tank designed by the Center for Research and Evaluation of China think tank of Nanjing University,we quantify the subjective expectation value of the brain trust to decisionmaking in the result dimension. Finally,the core indicators were quantitatively screened by combining research and SPSS analysis,thus forming a specific index system of three dimensions: I,A and O. [Result/conclusion] The model o

关 键 词：智库 智囊团 决策功能派 IAO模型 评价指标体系 

分 类 号：C932[经济管理—管理学] C934