检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵文静 ZHAO Wenjing(Law School of Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450001,China)
机构地区:[1]郑州大学法学院
出 处:《洛阳理工学院学报(社会科学版)》2020年第1期47-53,59,共8页Journal of Luoyang Institute of Science and Technology:Social Science Edition
摘 要:无权处分人订立的合同是否有效是学界历来争议的焦点。虽然我国没有明确区分负担行为和处分行为,但是基于物权法已有的区分原则的支持,以及物债二分的大背景,无权处分合同也应被认定为有效。认定合同有效并不意味着要区分采取负担行为与处分行为,因为在我国目前的民法体系下,于法律行为章节中区分采取负担行为与处分行为的架构设计似乎并不现实。善意取得制度和无权处分关系密切,但理论支持却困难重重,受让人善意和恶意的区分在合同的效力以及对所有权的取得上也会产生一定的影响。这些都是民法典编纂之际应当予以明确的问题,以期解决民法体系中有关买卖合同的一系列问题,合法保障各方当事人的权益。Whether the contract concluded by the person who has no right to dispose is valid or not has always been the focus of controversy in the academic circle.Although there is no clear distinction between the act of burden and the act of disposition in our country,the contract of unauthorized disposition,based on the support of the principle of distinction stipulated in the property law and the background of the dichotomy of property debt,should be regarded as valid.Ascertaining its validity does not mean that we should adopt the theory of distinguishing the burden behavior from the punishment behavior to determine the validity of the contract,because under the current civil law system of our country,it seems unrealistic to adopt a framework design of distinguishing the burden behavior from the punishment behavior in the chapter of legal ACTS.The system of acquisition in good faith is closely related to the disposal without right,but the theoretical support is difficult.It is also a problem which should be made clear when the civil code is compiled whether the distinction between the transferee′s good faith and bad faith has an impact on the effectiveness of the contract and the acquisition of ownership.These are the problems that should be made clear at the time of compiling The Civil Code of the People′s Republic of China,so as to solve a series of problems related to sales contracts in the civil law system to protect the legitimate rights and interests of all parties.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.170