辽吉两地传染病监测结果的信息利用现状与趋势分析  被引量:1

Status quo and trend of information utilization of infectious disease surveillance results in Provinces of Liaoning and Jilin

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:陈超亿 陈若卉 郑岩 潘琳 刘泽 孙承尧 石林梅[1,7] 李伯阳 张亮[2,7] 蒲川 徐凌忠[4,7] 胡志 李程跃[6,7] 郝模 郝艳华[1,7] 吴群红 CHEN Chaoyi;CHEN Ruohui;ZHENG Yan;PAN Lin;LIU Ze;SUN Chengyao;SHI Linmei;LI Boyang;ZHANG Liang;PU Chuan;XU Lingzhong;HU Zhi;LI Chengyue;HAO Mo;HAO Yanhua;WU Qunhong(School of Public Health,Harbin Medical University,Harbin,Heilongjiang 150081,China;School of Medical and Health Management,Tongji Medical College,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan,Hubei 430074,China;School of Public Health and Management,Chongqing Medical University,Chongqing 400016,China;School of Public Health,Shandong University,Jinan,Shandong 250012,China;School of Health Management,Anhui Medical University,Hefei,Anhui 230032,China;Fudan University,Shanghai 200032,China;Collaborative Innovation Center for Health-related Major Social Risk Early Warning,Shanghai 200032,China)

机构地区:[1]哈尔滨医科大学公共卫生学院,黑龙江哈尔滨150081 [2]华中科技大学同济医学院医药卫生管理学院,湖北武汉430074 [3]重庆医科大学公共卫生与管理学院,重庆400016 [4]山东大学公共卫生学院,山东济南250012 [5]安徽医科大学卫生管理学院,安徽合肥230032 [6]复旦大学,上海200032 [7]健康相关重大社会风险预警协同创新中心,上海200032

出  处:《中国农村卫生事业管理》2019年第12期883-887,共5页Chinese Rural Health Service Administration

基  金:国家自然科学基金项目(71673072);上海市加强公共卫生体系建设三年行动计划(2015年-2017年)项目(GWIV-32)

摘  要:目的比较辽吉两地传染病监测结果的风险信息的有效利用程度,明确信息有效利用的内涵及意义,尝试量化表达信息有效利用的程度并验证其可行性。方法从政府、卫计委、疾控等机构的官方网站以及中国知网、web of science等公开信息渠道系统收集利用监测系统发布的涉及传染病风险的公开信息和文献,统计两地利用传染病监测信息系统发布的传染病健康风险识别、预警、干预、干预效果评估的信息资料,运用量化趋势分析法比较辽吉两地的突发传染病领域内的信息的有效利用程度,运用Spearman相关分析信息的有效利用程度与突发领域防制效果之间的关系。结果吉林省传染病监测信息有效利用的程度是由2008年的0.00%上升至2017年的1.60%,而辽宁省的传染病监测信息有效利用的程度从2008年的1.70%波动下降至2017年的1.5%,吉林省的信息有效利用的程度与突发传染病领域防制效果呈正相关,而辽宁省则无相关性。结论为完善突发卫生领域的应急保障体系,政府相关部门应实时分析与充分利用各类突发应急信息、提升健康信息的可识别性,以便进行科学决策。辽吉两地卫生应急领域的信息系统有效利用信息的程度仍需进一步提高,研究结果表明,对两省的传染病应急体系信息有效利用程度的量化分析是可行的。Objective To compare the degree of effective use of risk information in the monitoring results of infectious diseases in Provinces of Liaoning and Jilin, to clarify the connotation and significance of effective use of information, to try to quantify the extent of effective use of information and to verify its feasibility. Methods Public information and literature on the risk of infectious diseases published by the monitoring system was collected from the official websites of the government, the Health Planning Commission, Center for Disease Control and Prevention, and the public information channels such as China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Web of Science. We made statistical analysis of the information on the health risk identification, early warning, intervention and intervention evaluation of infectious diseases issued by the disease surveillance information system, using quantitative trend analysis method to compare the effective utilization of information in the field of emergency infectious diseases between Liaoning and Jilin, and using Spearman correlation to analyze the relationship between the effective use of information and the effectiveness of prevention in the field. Results The effective use of infectious disease surveillance information in Jilin Province increased from 0.00% in 2008 to 1.60% in 2017, while that in Liaoning Province decreased from 1.70% in 2008 to 1.5% in 2017. The degree of effective use of information in Jilin Province was positively correlated with the preventive effect in the field of emergency infectious diseases, while there was no correlation between the two in Liaoning Province. Conclusions In order to improve the emergency support system in the field of emergency health, relevant government departments should analyze and make full use of all kinds of emergency information in real time, and improve the identifiability of health information for scientific decision-making;The effective use of information in emergency systems of public health in Provinces of Liaoning

关 键 词:突发传染病 防制效果 信息监测 有效利用 

分 类 号:R183[医药卫生—流行病学] R19[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象