检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王克强 李德文[1] 王有鹏 Wang Keqiang;Li Dewen;Wang Youpeng(Key Laboratory of Crustal Dynamics,Institute of Crustal Dynamics,China Earthquake Administration,Beijing 100085;Wuhai Emergency Management Bureau,Wuhai 016000,Inner Mongolia)
机构地区:[1]中国地震局地壳动力学重点实验室/中国地震局地壳应力研究所,北京100085 [2]内蒙古自治区乌海市应急管理局,内蒙古自治区乌海016000
出 处:《第四纪研究》2020年第1期229-237,共9页Quaternary Sciences
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(批准号:41471002)资助。
摘 要:以新型快速成像及处理技术为基础的动态图像法可为单个样品快速建立百万至上亿个颗粒的图像及粒度、粒形参数数据库,可直观表现天然沉积物的海量颗粒的大小和形状信息,但目前对其与激光法测试结果之间的异同尚缺乏深入理解。本文对采自山东半岛黄岛地区黄海沿岸3处海滩共190个样品进行动态图像粒度分析,通过等效投影面积径(等积径)计算均值粒径、分选系数、偏度、峰度等粒度参数,并与激光法测试结果进行对比。结果表明:1)现代海滩沉积物图像法统计粒径比激光法稍粗,但二者之间的差异较之细粒沉积物较多的类型(如冲洪积物)而言已经很小;2)现代海滩沉积物图像法粒度分析较之激光法分选更优,偏度和峰度均更小;3)图像法和激光法粒度分析结果在沉积环境判别中具有相近的功能,但图像法对沉积环境和动力条件的响应更为敏感。这些认识为动态图像粒度分析技术的应用推广和资料解释提供了新的理论与技术支持。The dynamic image method,based on rapid image-processing technology,can quickly create a massive database of grain size,shape and parameters for natural sediment,directly represent the size and shape information of grains up to a hundred million for each sample.However,at present,there is still a lack of deep understanding of the similarities and differences between them and the test results of other traditional methods.In this paper,8 groups of samples were collected from the Yellow Sea coast of Huangdao District(35°53'~36°08'N,120°01'~120°18'E),Qingdao City,Shandong Province.Among them,1 group of samples is taken from the apex to the front of the Fenghe River Delta,1 group from the beach between Fenghe River and Yinzhuhe River,4 groups from two intertidal zones located at Jinshatan Beach(two groups)and the Yinshatan Beach(two groups),respectively,and 2 groups from two short profiles located at the front of the Fenghe River Delta and near the high tide level of Yinshatan Beach,respectively.A total of 190 samples were analyzed by dynamic-image grain-sizer and laser grain-sizer,respectively.The results of dynamic image method are based on the equivalent-projection area diameter to calculate the median grain-size,mean grain-size,sorting,skewness,kurtosis and others,and compare them with the corresponding parameters by laser one.The results show that:(1)The comparison of grain-size frequency distributions shows that the major difference between two methods is concentrated on the finer tail,and the portion of finer grains by laser method usually far exceeds that by image one.As to the cumulative frequency curve,the laser method usually shows more complex segments than the imaging one.(2)The comparison of grain-size data indicates that the grain-size by imaging method in the study area is slightly coarser than that of the laser one(the direct contrast is between 0.004~0.448 phi,and the difference under the same measurement range is 0.005~0.441 phi;the maximum difference of physical size is about 36%).The differenc
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49