检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨榆娟 张治平 马继孔 Yang Yujuan;Zhang Zhiping;Ma Jikong(Department of Nephrology,Dalizhou Hospital,Yunnan Province Dali,Yunnan Dali 671000)
机构地区:[1]云南大理州医院肾内科
出 处:《中国社区医师》2020年第7期23-24,共2页Chinese Community Doctors
摘 要:目的:观察DNA免疫吸附治疗重度活动性系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)的临床疗效及安全性。方法:2017年1月-2018年12月收治重症SLE患者24例,分为两组。常规治疗组采用常规治疗,DNA吸附组在常规治疗的基础上采用免疫吸附治疗。比较两组治疗效果。结果:DNA吸附组临床症状改善明显优于常规治疗组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组治疗后ANA、ds-DNA抗体、免疫球蛋白指标明显下降,DNA吸附组下降效果更显著,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组补体C3指标均升高,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组对肝肾功能、血常规等指标均无明显影响。结论:DNA免疫吸附治疗重度活动性SLE有明显的临床疗效,是一种新的治疗手段。Objective:To observe the clinical efficacy and safety of DNA immunoadsorption in the treatment of severe active systemic lupus erythematosus(SLE).Methods:24 patients with severe SLE were selected from January 2017 to December 2018,they were divided into the two groups.Routine treatment was used in the routine treatment group,the DNA adsorption group was treated by immunoadsorption on the basis of routine treatment.The therapeutic effects of the two groups were compared.Results:The clinical effect of the DNA adsorption group was better than that of the conventional treatment group,after treatment,the ANA ds-DNA antibody and immunoglobulin decreased significantly in both groups,the effect of the DNA adsorption group was more significant,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The C3 index of complement increased in both groups,there was no significant difference(P<0.05).The two groups had no significant effect on liver and kidney function and blood routine test.Conclusion:DNA immunoadsorption has obvious clinical effect on severe active SLE,it is a new treatment.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.190.207.221