检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者: 周伊(译) Ursula Rautenberg;Zhou Yi(FAU Erlangen Nuremberg,Erlangen,91054;School of Informaiton Management,Wuhan University,Wuhan,430072)
机构地区:[1]德国埃尔朗根-纽伦堡大学,埃尔朗根,91054 [2]武汉大学信息管理学院,武汉430072
出 处:《出版科学》2020年第2期17-21,共5页Publishing Journal
摘 要:2019年,德国出版商和书商贸易协会发布了一份关于图书阅读和购买的权威报告。调查结果令人担忧,其中一项数据显示,有超过600万过去经常阅读的德国人在2013-2017年间没有购买过一本书籍。现在,“改善阅读的形象”已经成为德国出版商和书商贸易协会的一项重大目标。图书的“象征资本”——德国出版商和书商贸易协会称之为图书所蕴含的“良好积极的意象”,这种价值归属已经在历史长河中存续了几个世纪。即使在今天,阅读图书、拥有图书仍然是区分社会阶层和文化差异的重要属性。尽管人们提倡应该多阅读,但定期调查的实际阅读情况并不理想。应该如何看待这一矛盾?图书的象征资本目前正发生着怎样的转变?未来数字图书的象征资本又会怎样呢?Last year,the German Publishers and Booksellers Association(Börsenverein)published a representative study on reading and buying books.The results were alarming:for example,more than six million German readers who used to read regularly had not bought a book between 2013 and 2017.One of the tasks set by the Börsenverein would be“to improve the image of reading books”.The“symbolic capital”(Pierre Bourdieu)of the book-the“good image”of the book as the“Börsenverein”calls it-,has centuries-long tradition of value attributions.Even today,reading and book ownership are characteristics of the cultural distinction of social classes and milieus.However,surveys regularly show that there is a gap between actual reading habits and the demand that one should read more.How is this contradiction to be classified?What transformations are currently in flux and what might the symbolic capital of the digital book look like in the future?
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.143