检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:方菲[1,2] 叶冉玲 杨冀 Fang Fei;Ye Ranling;Yang Ji(School of New Media,Peking University,Beijing,100871;School of Information Management,Wuhan University,Wuhan,430072)
机构地区:[1]北京大学新媒体研究院,北京100871 [2]武汉大学信息管理学院,武汉430072
出 处:《出版科学》2020年第2期67-73,共7页Publishing Journal
基 金:国家社会科学基金重点项目“学术出版体制机制创新研究”(18ATQ006)的中期研究成果。
摘 要:融媒体时代,学术资源的开发和利用情况较纸媒时代发生了很大变化。社交媒体参与学术交流,极大地影响了研究人员、图书情报机构和传统学术出版机构等学术交流利益相关方学术资源的开发和利用行为与利用方式。通过对学术型社区、学术搜索引擎、学术博客与论坛等6类学术社交媒体的调研,分析探讨当前社交媒体学术资源的开发和利用状况。研究结果显示:社交媒体学术资源类型丰富,数量庞大,涵盖学科面广;学术交流利益相关方使用社交媒体学术资源的情况持续向好,研究人员和图书情报机构利用的积极性较高,传统学术出版机构利用的积极性较低。In the era of media convergence,the development and utilization of academic resources have changed a lot compared with that of paper media.The participation of social media in academic communication has greatly affected the development and utilization of academic resources of stakeholders in academic exchanges,such as researchers,library and information institutions and traditional academic publishing institutions.Based on the research of six kinds of academic social media,such as academic community,academic search engine,academic blog and forum,this paper analyzes and discusses the current development and utilization of social media academic resources.The results show that:social media academic resources are rich in types and large in number,covering a wide range of disciplines;the use of social media academic resources by academic exchange stakeholders continues to improve,researchers,library and information institutions are more active in using them,and traditional academic publishing institutions are less active in using them.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171