检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:苏羽佳 Su Yujia(School of Law,Anhui University,Hefei Anhui 230601)
出 处:《安徽警官职业学院学报》2019年第6期52-55,共4页Journal of Anhui Vocational College of Police Officers
摘 要:捕诉合一与捕诉分离的问题,对我国检察制度和刑事诉讼制度有重大影响。“捕诉合一”由来已久,随着捕诉合一试点的推进,“批捕权”的滥用、犯罪嫌疑人和辩护人的辩护空间被压缩、检察机关监督地位的弱化等问题逐渐暴露出来。针对这些问题首先应从完善内部制约监督机制入手,同时建立对逮捕决定的听证程序,并将审判权引入审前程序以平衡捕诉关系。The issue of the combination and separation of detention approval and prosecution has a significant impact on China's procuratorial system and criminal procedure system.Although the“combination of detention approval and prosecution”has a long history,with the advancement of the pilot,some problems have gradually emerged,such as the abuse of the right to detention approval,the shrinking of the defense space of criminal suspects and defenders,and the weakening of the procuratorial authority's supervisory status.In response to these problems,it should start with improving the internal restrictive and supervision mechanism,establish hearing procedures for detetion approval,and introduce the trial rights into pretrial procedures to balance the relationship between the detention approval and prosecution.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30