检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙砾[1] SUN Li(Kenneth Wang School of Law,Soochow University,Suzhou)
机构地区:[1]苏州大学王健法学院
出 处:《科学.经济.社会》2020年第1期63-69,共7页Science Economy Society
基 金:江苏省研究生科研创新计划《针对PPP提起的公益诉讼之被告确认问题研究》(项目编号:KYCX18_2441)之阶段性研究成果
摘 要:公益诉讼制度是PPP模式下公益救济的有效途径,其中,行政附带民事公益诉讼这一类型与之最为契合,但在司法实践中可能会面临诸多困境:一是对PPP民事公益诉讼之合理性的质疑;二是在PPP行政公益诉讼中的被告选择问题;三是由于行政附带民事公益诉讼的受案范围还存在较大的局限性,在PPP模式中能否适用尚不明确。为此,应通过解释论和立法论的双重路径来扫除理论上的障碍,明确公益诉讼的法律定位,拓展行政公益诉讼的适格被告范围以及行政附带民事公益诉讼的受案范围。The public interest litigation system is an effective path to public interest relief under in the PPP mode. Thereinto,the administrative incidental civil public interest litigation is the most suitable type. But there may be many difficulties in judicial practice: first,the suspiction towards the rationality of PPP civil public interest litigation;second,the choice of defendants in PPP administrative public interest litigation;third,due to the limitations of the administrative incidental civil public interest litigation scope,it is not clear whether it can be applied in the PPP mode. To this end,the theoretical obstacles should be removed through the dual path of legal interpretation and legislation. The orientation of public interest litigation should be clarified in the legislation,and the scope of eligible defendants in administrative public interest litigation and the scope of administrative incidental civil public interest litigation should be expanded.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.170