检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王金花 WANG Jin-hua(Beijing Customs District,P.R.China,Beijing 100036)
机构地区:[1]北京海关,北京100036
出 处:《全球科技经济瞭望》2019年第7期32-36,共5页Global Science,Technology and Economy Outlook
摘 要:德国政府非常重视科技计划的评估。通过评估以检测科技计划中资助措施的实施效果,总结经验,提出建议,为完善已有的或制定新的资助措施提供依据。德国政府科技计划评估主要包括3种情况:一是专业项目管理机构在管理资助计划过程中进行的评估,二是委托外部机构专门针对科研计划开展的评估,三是项目资助机构直接开展的评估。不同形式和从不同角度开展的评估,为德国科技计划的有效实施和持续发展提供了有力保障,值得我们研究和借鉴。The German government attaches great importance to the evaluation of scientific and technological programs.By examining the effect of funding policies in scientific and technological programs,analyzing experiences and recommending suggestions,the evaluation provides a basis for the making,formulation and perfection of funding policies.The evaluation of the research programs are usually implemented in three dimensions in Germany.First,the assessments conducted by professional project management agencies during the management of funding programs.Second,specific assessment of defined research project implemented by entrusted external agencies.Third,specific evaluation carried out by the project funding agency.The variety of evaluation forms and views ensures the effectiveness and sustainability of German scientific and technological programs,and is worth being further studied and referred.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145